Field Value Correction Note |
4 |
|
1 |
| Gooey(?) |
M |
|
Domestic |
S |
Jun 23 |
1883 |
17 |
On line 4,
the value for the surname
field is "[ ]",
the suggested correction is "Gooey(?)". Submitted by Cheryl Martyn.
The following comment was attached: when single name is non-English, we are requested to use the name as a surname
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
4 |
|
1 |
| Gooey(?) |
M |
|
Domestic |
S |
Jun 23 |
1883 |
17 |
On line 4,
the value for the givens
field is "Gooey(?)",
the suggested correction is "". Submitted by Cheryl Martyn.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
5 |
|
1 |
| Haug |
M |
|
Servant |
S |
Jan 9 |
1866 |
34 |
On line 5,
the value for the givens
field is "Haug",
the suggested correction is "". Submitted by Cheryl Martyn.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
5 |
|
1 |
| Haug |
M |
|
Servant |
S |
Jan 9 |
1866 |
34 |
On line 5,
the value for the surname
field is "[ ]",
the suggested correction is "Hang". Submitted by Cheryl Martyn.
The following comment was attached: when single name is non-English, we are requested to use the name as a surname
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
25 |
|
6 |
Hanes | Ivory A. |
M |
|
s. son |
S |
Mar 29 |
18?0 |
|
On line 25,
the value for the year
field is "18?0",
the suggested correction is "1900". Submitted by Cheryl Martyn.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
28 |
|
7 |
| Chow |
M |
|
Servant |
M |
Jun 15 |
1872 |
28 |
On line 28,
the value for the givens
field is "Chow",
the suggested correction is "". Submitted by Cheryl Martyn.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
28 |
|
7 |
| Chow |
M |
|
Servant |
M |
Jun 15 |
1872 |
28 |
On line 28,
the value for the surname
field is "[ ]",
the suggested correction is "Chow". Submitted by Cheryl Martyn.
The following comment was attached: when single name is non-English, we are requested to use the name as a surname
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
30 |
|
8 |
| Lucertine |
F |
|
Servant |
S |
|
1871 |
20 |
On line 30,
the value for the surname
field is "[ ]",
the suggested correction is "Chilcoten". Submitted by Cheryl Martyn.
The following comment was attached: Column 14 has her as Chilcoten Indian so this should be her surname -Tips and Guidelines -Groups without Surnames
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
31 |
|
8 |
| Lucy |
F |
|
Lodger |
S |
Feb 13 |
? |
|
On line 31,
the value for the surname
field is "[ ]",
the suggested correction is "Chilcoten". Submitted by Cheryl Martyn.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
31 |
|
8 |
| Lucy |
F |
|
Lodger |
S |
Feb 13 |
? |
|
On line 31,
the value for the year
field is "?",
the suggested correction is "1901". Submitted by Cheryl Martyn.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
34 |
|
11 |
McLinchey(?) | Patrick |
M |
|
Head |
S |
Jan |
1863 |
38 |
On line 34,
the value for the surname
field is "McLinchey(?)",
the suggested correction is "McLinchey". Submitted by Cheryl Martyn.
The following comment was attached: "McClinchy" in the archives but I also see an "e" here
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
37 |
|
13 |
Eliott | Charles W. |
M |
|
Head |
S |
? |
|
28 |
On line 37,
the value for the year
field is "[ ]",
the suggested correction is "1872". Submitted by Cheryl Martyn.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
44 |
|
16 |
Chu | Mum |
M |
|
Servant |
S |
Oct 1 |
1880 |
20 |
On line 44,
the value for the givens
field is "Mum",
the suggested correction is "Mun". Submitted by Cheryl Martyn.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
45 |
|
17 |
Bayliff(?) | Hugh L. P. |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Apr 1 |
1864 |
36 |
On line 45,
the value for the surname
field is "Bayliff(?)",
the suggested correction is "Bayliff". Submitted by Cheryl Martyn.
The following comment was attached: name confirmed BC Archives
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
50 |
|
17 |
| Sang |
M |
|
Domestic |
M |
Sep 5 |
1861 |
39 |
On line 50,
the value for the givens
field is "Sang",
the suggested correction is "". Submitted by Cheryl Martyn.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
50 |
|
17 |
| Sang |
M |
|
Domestic |
M |
Sep 5 |
1861 |
39 |
On line 50,
the value for the surname
field is "[ ]",
the suggested correction is "Sang". Submitted by Cheryl Martyn.
The following comment was attached: when single name is non-English, we are requested to use the name as a surname
|
|