1901 Census of Canada Page Information |
District: | ON PEEL (#103) |
Subdistrict: | Toronto (Township/Canton)
D-9
Page 11 |
Image: |
View the image with:
split screen Images are from National Archives Web Site |
Details: | Schedule 1 Microfilm T-6490 |
Transcriber: | Dave Johnson |
|
|
Note: this index is only a partial transcription of the original form, see the image for the complete census data.
indicates a note applies to this line, see the bottom of the page.
@ next to the line number indicates contact information for someone
researching this person, see the bottom of the page.
If you find a transcription error on this page please use the
proof page
to verify the error is in the transcription and not the original, and to report it.
|
100 |
Dennis Robert |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Nov 22 |
1851 |
50
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
Dennis Elizbeth |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Mar 2 |
1854 |
47
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
Dennis Wm |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Apr 18 |
1876 |
24
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
Dennis Annie |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Jun 23 |
1878 |
22
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
Dennis Ellie |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Sep 8 |
1882 |
18
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
Dennis Lornie |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Apr 30 |
1897 |
4
|
|
|
|
|
101 |
Ramage James |
M |
|
Head |
S |
Jun 2 |
1875 |
25
|
|
|
01 |
|
102 |
Weston Gorge? |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Mar 1 |
1862 |
39
|
|
|
01 |
|
102 |
Weston Ema |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Sep 24 |
1864 |
36
|
|
|
01 |
|
102 |
Weston Marion |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Apr 24 |
1897 |
4
|
|
|
01 |
|
102 |
Weston Charle |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Aug 27 |
1898 |
2
|
|
|
01 |
|
103 |
Leetch ? John |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Mar 15 |
|
65
|
|
|
|
|
103 |
Leetch ? Amy |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Sep 30 |
|
64
|
|
|
|
|
103 |
Leetch ? Charle |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Apr 4 |
1877 |
23
|
|
|
|
|
104 |
Burns Andrew |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Aug 24 |
1863 |
38
|
|
|
01 |
|
104 |
Burns Marget |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Sep 22 |
1871 |
30
|
|
|
01 |
|
104 |
Burns James |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Apr 3 |
1889 |
12
|
|
|
01 |
|
104 |
Burns Orang |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Nov 14 |
1894 |
6
|
|
|
01 |
|
105 |
Smith John |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Apr 28 |
1866 |
35
|
|
|
01 |
|
105 |
Smith Alish |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Apr 16 |
1866 |
35
|
|
|
01 |
|
105 |
Smith Mary |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Jun 19 |
1900 |
3/4
|
|
|
01 |
|
106 |
Heard Samul |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Apr 25 |
1851 |
50
|
|
|
|
|
106 |
Heard Mary |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
? 30 |
1851 |
50
|
|
|
|
|
106 |
Heard Jospene |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Jul 25 |
1885 |
16
|
|
|
|
|
107 |
Hughes Edwin |
M |
|
Head |
S |
Jul 18 |
1853 |
47
|
|
|
|
|
107 |
Hughes Libbie |
F |
|
Sist? |
S |
Apr 20 |
1863 |
37
|
|
|
|
|
107 |
Hughes Birtran |
M |
|
Brother |
S |
Oct 30 |
1866 |
34
|
|
|
|
|
107 |
Hughes Mary |
F |
|
Sist |
W |
Jun 1 |
1860 |
40
|
|
|
|
|
107 |
Hughes Mable |
F |
|
Niece |
S |
Apr 1 |
1887 |
14
|
|
|
|
|
107 |
Hughes Elsa |
F |
|
Niece |
S |
Aug 2 |
1889 |
12
|
|
|
|
|
107 |
Deas? Harry |
M |
|
L |
S |
Feb 4 |
1879 |
22
|
|
|
|
|
108 |
Hughes Silas |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Feb 14 |
185? |
46
|
|
|
01 |
|
108 |
Hughes Mitilidia? |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Jan 1 |
1855 |
44
|
|
|
01 |
|
108 |
Hughes Allan |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Apr 23 |
1878 |
23
|
|
|
01 |
|
108 |
Hughes Bessie |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Feb 9 |
1884 |
17
|
|
|
|
|
108 |
Hughes Edna |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Nov 23 |
1885 |
15
|
|
|
|
|
108 |
Hughes Cora |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Jul 18 |
1893 |
7
|
|
|
|
|
108 |
Hughes Alfred |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Aug 17 |
1895 |
5
|
|
|
01 |
|
109 |
Kivell Frank |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Dec 29 |
1860 |
40
|
|
|
01 |
|
109 |
Kivell Cathern |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Jun 15 |
1857 |
43
|
|
|
01 |
|
109 |
Kivell Ida |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
May 26 |
1880 |
19
|
|
|
|
|
109 |
Kivell Jessie |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Apr 11 |
1885 |
15
|
|
|
01 |
|
109 |
Kivell Mertil |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Dec 25 |
1899 |
1
|
|
|
01 |
|
109 |
Kivell Albert |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Mar 25 |
1873 |
27
|
|
|
|
|
110 |
Lock Tom |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Dec 9 |
1866 |
33
|
|
|
01 |
|
110 |
Lock Mary |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Oct 17 |
1875 |
26
|
|
|
01 |
|
110 |
Lock Rosie |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Jan 11 |
1890 |
11
|
|
|
|
|
110 |
Lock Bessie |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Dec 10 |
1893 |
7
|
|
|
01 |
|
110 |
Lock Walter |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Jun 24 |
1899 |
2
|
|
|
01 |
|
110 |
Shorey Mary |
F |
|
Mot |
S |
Jul 15 |
1842 |
58
|
|
|
|
Line Notes On This Page
The following note applies to line 2:
'Month of birth is unclear - looks like Mov.' |
The following note applies to line 12:
The following note applies to line 13:
The following note applies to line 23:
'Month of birth is unclear - looks like Spr.' |
The following note applies to line 28:
'Mary HUGHES was a sister of Edwin, however she was a widow of Cyrus PATTERSON. Her surname and that of her daughters Mabel and Elsa should be PATTERSON.' |
Surname Notes On This Page
In household 110, the enumerator wrote the surname as 'Lock',
a suggested alternative surname is 'Luck'.
Field Correction Notes on this page
Field correction notes are suggested changes offered by a
proofreader or user, they should not be considered authoritative. If
the transcriber agrees with the suggestion they will change the line.
Notes for changes that have been made are removed periodically. The
presence of an uncorrected note is an extra prompt to the user to
consult the image. It is always good practice to confirm the accuracy
of the transcription by consulting the image.
Field Value Correction Note |
12 |
|
103 |
Leetch ? | John |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Mar 15 |
|
65 |
On line 12,
the value for the surname
field is "Leekah ?",
the suggested correction is "Leetch?". Submitted anonymously.
The following comment was attached: This family is Leach in 1911.
|
This correction was evaluated by Dave Johnson:
The suggested change has been made
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
27 |
|
107 |
Hughes | Birtran |
M |
|
Brother |
S |
Oct 30 |
1866 |
34 |
On line 27,
the value for the givens
field is "Butrum",
the suggested correction is "Bertram". Submitted anonymously.
The following comment was attached: Relative of mine
|
This correction was evaluated by Dave Johnson:
I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original.
This comment was added: The name probably was Bertram, but this is not what the actual record says.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
33 |
|
108 |
Hughes | Mitilidia? |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Jan 1 |
1855 |
44 |
On line 33,
the value for the givens
field is "Mitildia?",
the suggested correction is "Matilda". Submitted anonymously.
The following comment was attached: Silas' wife was Matilda PATTERSON.
|
This correction was evaluated by Dave Johnson:
I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original.
This comment was added: I agree that the name was probably Matilda, but this is not what the actual reord says.
|
|
Researcher contact information
Line 45: Researcher contact:
this is my grandfather More |
To register as a person researching someone on this page
click here.
Go to: Subdistrict Number: d-9
District: PEEL
National: Canada.
Quick search for possible matches to 1911 Census
All data on this site is copyrighted, use for personal research is free.
Redistribution requires permission: email census@automatedgenealogy.com