Site Home Linking Message Boards Help | Automated Genealogy | Census Indices: 1901 1906 1911 1852CA 1851NB |
|
|
Note: this index is only a partial transcription of the original form, see the image for the complete census data.
indicates a note applies to this line, see the bottom of the page.
If you find a transcription error on this page please use the
proof page
to verify the error is in the transcription and not the original, and to report it.
L i n e # |
Numbered in order of visitation | Personal Description | ||||||||||
H o u s e |
Family or House- hold |
Name of each person in family or household on 31st March, 1901. | Sex. | C o l o u r |
Relationship to head of family or household. |
Single, married, widowed or divorced. |
Month and date of birth. | Year of birth. | Age at last birthday. | |||
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 82 | Bidler G P | M | Head | M | Jul 31 | 1860 |
|
||||
2 | 82 | Bidler M | F | Wife | M | Apr 7 | 1865 |
|
||||
3 | 82 | Bidler A A | M | Son | S | Jun 27 | 1888 |
|
||||
4 | 83 | Solomon S | M | Head | M | Jul 17 | 1838 |
|
||||
5 | 83 | Solomon M | F | Wife | M | Aug 11 | 1840 |
|
||||
6 | 83 | Solomon A | M | Son | S | May 26 | 1866 |
|
||||
7 | 83 | Solomon A | F | Daughter | S | Feb 2 | 1875 |
|
||||
8 | 84 | Bolan C | M | Head | M | May 15 | 1869 |
|
||||
9 | 84 | Bolan Daisy | F | Wife | M | Nov 12 | 1870 |
|
||||
10 | 84 | Bolan V K | F | Daughter | S | Aug 19 | 1900 |
|
||||
11 | 84 | Bolan A | F | cousin | S | Mar 3 | 1880 |
|
||||
12 | 84 | Thompson I | M | cousin | S | Dec 12 | 1878 |
|
||||
13 | 85 | Ward A R | M | Head | M | Aug 31 | 1864 |
|
||||
14 | 85 | Ward A. M | F | Wife | M | Jul 11 | 1870 |
|
||||
15 | 85 | Ward G. B. | F | Daughter | S | Aug 29 | 1892 |
|
||||
16 | 85 | Ward S. F. | F | Daughter | S | Jul 26 | 1894 |
|
||||
17 | 85 | Ward A | F | Daughter | S | Jun 10 | 1896 |
|
||||
18 | 85 | Ward I C | M | Son | S | Jul 26 | 1890 |
|
||||
19 | 86 | Kirby R. | M | Head | S | Nov 29 | 1874 |
|
||||
20 | 86 | Attula M. | M | roomer | S | Aug 25 | 1884 |
|
||||
21 | 87 | Elliott S | M | Head | M | Aug 22 | 1872 |
|
||||
22 | 87 | Elliott M | F | Wife | M | Jul 12 | 1877 |
|
||||
23 | 87 | Elliott I | F | Daughter | S | Mar 11 | 1899 |
|
||||
24 | 87 | Cascieto I | M | father in law | M | Sep 22 | 1853 |
|
||||
25 | 87 | Cascieto E | F | mother in law | M | Jun 9 | 1860 |
|
||||
26 | 87 | Cascieto A | F | sister in law | S | Aug 22 | 1892 |
|
||||
27 | 87 | Cascieto Thesa | F | sister in law | S | Aug 20 | 1900 |
|
||||
28 | 87 | Cascieto M | M | bro in law | S | Jun 4 | 1894 |
|
||||
29 | 87 | Cascieto Ac? | M | bro in law | S | Jan 4 | 1896 |
|
||||
30 | 87 | Cascieto I | F | sister in law | S | Dec 25 | 1897 |
|
||||
31 | 88 | Ball Jos | M | Head | M | Feb 15 | 1849 |
|
||||
32 | 88 | Ball A | F | Wife | M | Apr 5 | 1861 |
|
||||
33 | 88 | Ball S | M | Son | S | Aug 25 | 1880 |
|
||||
34 | 89 | Dixon I | M | Head | M | Feb 4 | 1857 |
|
||||
35 | 89 | Dixon E | F | Wife | M | Dec 16 | 1861 |
|
||||
36 | 89 | Dixon G | F | Daughter | S | Dec 4 | 1880 |
|
||||
37 | 90 | Hansard E | M | Head | S | Apr 14 | 1865 |
|
||||
38 | 90 | Kearney M | F | roomer | M | Jul 12 | 1869 |
|
||||
39 | 90 | Kearney G | M | roomer | S | Jun 14 | 1887 |
|
||||
40 | 91 | Poles A. G. | M | Head | M | Sep 21 | 1865 |
|
||||
41 | 91 | Poles I. | F | Wife | M | Sep 28 | 1867 |
|
||||
42 | 91 | Poles G. A. | M | Son | S | Jan 9 | 1899 |
|
||||
43 | 91 | Poles Q. M | F | Daughter | S | Sep 3 | 1896 |
|
||||
44 | 91 | Poles G. F | F | Daughter | S | May 7 | 1894 |
|
||||
45 | 92 | Dixon Chas | M | Head | M | Jul 11 | 1871 |
|
||||
46 | 92 | Dixon K | F | Wife | M | Mar 19 | 1875 |
|
||||
47 | 92 | Dixon M | F | Daughter | S | Feb 9 | 1896 |
|
||||
48 | 92 | Dixon Wm | M | Son | S | Aug 15 | 1898 |
|
||||
49 | 92 | Dixon Geo | M | Son | S | Dec 11 | 1900 |
|
||||
50 | 92 | Percy F. | F | roomer | W | Aug 14 | 1853 |
|
Field correction notes are suggested changes offered by a proofreader or user, they should not be considered authoritative. If the transcriber agrees with the suggestion they will change the line. Notes for changes that have been made are removed periodically. The presence of an uncorrected note is an extra prompt to the user to consult the image. It is always good practice to confirm the accuracy of the transcription by consulting the image.
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
11 | 84 | Bolan | A | F | cousin | S | Mar 3 | 1880 | 21 | ||
On line 11,
the value for the otherRelationship
field is "cousin",
the suggested correction is "Cousin". Submitted by Kevin Hanit. | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
12 | 84 | Thompson | I | M | cousin | S | Dec 12 | 1878 | 22 | ||
On line 12,
the value for the otherRelationship
field is "cousin",
the suggested correction is "Cousin". Submitted by Kevin Hanit. | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
20 | 86 | Attula | M. | M | roomer | S | Aug 25 | 1884 | 26 | ||
On line 20,
the value for the otherRelationship
field is "roomer",
the suggested correction is "Roomer". Submitted by Kevin Hanit. | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
24 | 87 | Cascieto | I | M | father in law | M | Sep 22 | 1853 | 47 | ||
On line 24,
the value for the otherRelationship
field is "father in law",
the suggested correction is "Father in law". Submitted by Kevin Hanit. | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
24 | 87 | Cascieto | I | M | father in law | M | Sep 22 | 1853 | 47 | ||
On line 24,
the value for the household
field is "87",
the suggested correction is "88". Submitted by Kevin Hanit. | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
25 | 87 | Cascieto | E | F | mother in law | M | Jun 9 | 1860 | 40 | ||
On line 25,
the value for the otherRelationship
field is "mother in law",
the suggested correction is "Mother in law". Submitted by Kevin Hanit. | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
25 | 87 | Cascieto | E | F | mother in law | M | Jun 9 | 1860 | 40 | ||
On line 25,
the value for the household
field is "87",
the suggested correction is "88". Submitted by Kevin Hanit. | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
26 | 87 | Cascieto | A | F | sister in law | S | Aug 22 | 1892 | 8 | ||
On line 26,
the value for the household
field is "87",
the suggested correction is "88". Submitted by Kevin Hanit. | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
26 | 87 | Cascieto | A | F | sister in law | S | Aug 22 | 1892 | 8 | ||
On line 26,
the value for the otherRelationship
field is "sister in law",
the suggested correction is "Sister in law". Submitted by Kevin Hanit. | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
27 | 87 | Cascieto | Thesa | F | sister in law | S | Aug 20 | 1900 | 1/2 | ||
On line 27,
the value for the otherRelationship
field is "sister in law",
the suggested correction is "Sister in law". Submitted by Kevin Hanit. | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
27 | 87 | Cascieto | Thesa | F | sister in law | S | Aug 20 | 1900 | 1/2 | ||
On line 27,
the value for the household
field is "87",
the suggested correction is "88". Submitted by Kevin Hanit. | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
28 | 87 | Cascieto | M | M | bro in law | S | Jun 4 | 1894 | 6 | ||
On line 28,
the value for the otherRelationship
field is "bro in law",
the suggested correction is "Bro in law". Submitted by Kevin Hanit. | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
28 | 87 | Cascieto | M | M | bro in law | S | Jun 4 | 1894 | 6 | ||
On line 28,
the value for the household
field is "87",
the suggested correction is "88". Submitted by Kevin Hanit. | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
29 | 87 | Cascieto | Ac? | M | bro in law | S | Jan 4 | 1896 | 5 | ||
On line 29,
the value for the givens
field is "Ac?",
the suggested correction is "Acton". Submitted by Kevin Hanit. | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
29 | 87 | Cascieto | Ac? | M | bro in law | S | Jan 4 | 1896 | 5 | ||
On line 29,
the value for the household
field is "87",
the suggested correction is "88". Submitted by Kevin Hanit. | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
29 | 87 | Cascieto | Ac? | M | bro in law | S | Jan 4 | 1896 | 5 | ||
On line 29,
the value for the otherRelationship
field is "bro in law",
the suggested correction is "Bro in law". Submitted by Kevin Hanit. | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
30 | 87 | Cascieto | I | F | sister in law | S | Dec 25 | 1897 | 3 | ||
On line 30,
the value for the household
field is "87",
the suggested correction is "88". Submitted by Kevin Hanit. | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
30 | 87 | Cascieto | I | F | sister in law | S | Dec 25 | 1897 | 3 | ||
On line 30,
the value for the otherRelationship
field is "sister in law",
the suggested correction is "Sister in law". Submitted by Kevin Hanit. | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
31 | 88 | Ball | Jos | M | Head | M | Feb 15 | 1849 | 52 | ||
On line 31,
the value for the household
field is "88",
the suggested correction is "89". Submitted by Kevin Hanit. | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
32 | 88 | Ball | A | F | Wife | M | Apr 5 | 1861 | 40 | ||
On line 32,
the value for the household
field is "88",
the suggested correction is "89". Submitted by Kevin Hanit. | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
33 | 88 | Ball | S | M | Son | S | Aug 25 | 1880 | 20 | ||
On line 33,
the value for the household
field is "88",
the suggested correction is "89". Submitted by Kevin Hanit. | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
34 | 89 | Dixon | I | M | Head | M | Feb 4 | 1857 | 44 | ||
On line 34,
the value for the household
field is "89",
the suggested correction is "90". Submitted by Kevin Hanit. | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
35 | 89 | Dixon | E | F | Wife | M | Dec 16 | 1861 | 39 | ||
On line 35,
the value for the household
field is "89",
the suggested correction is "90". Submitted by Kevin Hanit. | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
36 | 89 | Dixon | G | F | Daughter | S | Dec 4 | 1880 | 20 | ||
On line 36,
the value for the household
field is "89",
the suggested correction is "90". Submitted by Kevin Hanit. | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
37 | 90 | Hansard | E | M | Head | S | Apr 14 | 1865 | 36 | ||
On line 37,
the value for the household
field is "90",
the suggested correction is "91". Submitted by Kevin Hanit. | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
38 | 90 | Kearney | M | F | roomer | M | Jul 12 | 1869 | 31 | ||
On line 38,
the value for the otherRelationship
field is "roomer",
the suggested correction is "Roomer". Submitted by Kevin Hanit. | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
38 | 90 | Kearney | M | F | roomer | M | Jul 12 | 1869 | 31 | ||
On line 38,
the value for the household
field is "90",
the suggested correction is "91". Submitted by Kevin Hanit. | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
39 | 90 | Kearney | G | M | roomer | S | Jun 14 | 1887 | 13 | ||
On line 39,
the value for the otherRelationship
field is "roomer",
the suggested correction is "Roomer". Submitted by Kevin Hanit. | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
39 | 90 | Kearney | G | M | roomer | S | Jun 14 | 1887 | 13 | ||
On line 39,
the value for the household
field is "90",
the suggested correction is "91". Submitted by Kevin Hanit. | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
40 | 91 | Poles | A. G. | M | Head | M | Sep 21 | 1865 | 35 | ||
On line 40,
the value for the household
field is "91",
the suggested correction is "92". Submitted by Kevin Hanit. | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
41 | 91 | Poles | I. | F | Wife | M | Sep 28 | 1867 | 33 | ||
On line 41,
the value for the household
field is "91",
the suggested correction is "92". Submitted by Kevin Hanit. | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
42 | 91 | Poles | G. A. | M | Son | S | Jan 9 | 1899 | 2 | ||
On line 42,
the value for the household
field is "91",
the suggested correction is "92". Submitted by Kevin Hanit. | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
43 | 91 | Poles | Q. M | F | Daughter | S | Sep 3 | 1896 | 4 | ||
On line 43,
the value for the household
field is "91",
the suggested correction is "92". Submitted by Kevin Hanit. | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
43 | 91 | Poles | Q. M | F | Daughter | S | Sep 3 | 1896 | 4 | ||
On line 43,
the value for the givens
field is "Q. M",
the suggested correction is "O. M". Submitted by Kevin Hanit. | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
44 | 91 | Poles | G. F | F | Daughter | S | May 7 | 1894 | 6 | ||
On line 44,
the value for the surname
field is "Poles",
the suggested correction is "Coles". Submitted by Kevin Hanit. The following comment was attached: Make this correction after first correcting the household number for the Poles family to 92 from 91. | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
44 | 91 | Poles | G. F | F | Daughter | S | May 7 | 1894 | 6 | ||
On line 44,
the value for the household
field is "91",
the suggested correction is "92". Submitted by Kevin Hanit. | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
45 | 92 | Dixon | Chas | M | Head | M | Jul 11 | 1871 | 29 | ||
On line 45,
the value for the household
field is "92",
the suggested correction is "93". Submitted by Kevin Hanit. | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
46 | 92 | Dixon | K | F | Wife | M | Mar 19 | 1875 | 26 | ||
On line 46,
the value for the household
field is "92",
the suggested correction is "93". Submitted by Kevin Hanit. | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
47 | 92 | Dixon | M | F | Daughter | S | Feb 9 | 1896 | 5 | ||
On line 47,
the value for the household
field is "92",
the suggested correction is "93". Submitted by Kevin Hanit. | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
48 | 92 | Dixon | Wm | M | Son | S | Aug 15 | 1898 | 2 | ||
On line 48,
the value for the household
field is "92",
the suggested correction is "93". Submitted by Kevin Hanit. | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
49 | 92 | Dixon | Geo | M | Son | S | Dec 11 | 1900 | 1/2 | ||
On line 49,
the value for the household
field is "92",
the suggested correction is "93". Submitted by Kevin Hanit. | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
50 | 92 | Percy | F. | F | roomer | W | Aug 14 | 1853 | 47 | ||
On line 50,
the value for the otherRelationship
field is "roomer",
the suggested correction is "Roomer". Submitted by Kevin Hanit. | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
50 | 92 | Percy | F. | F | roomer | W | Aug 14 | 1853 | 47 | ||
On line 50,
the value for the household
field is "92",
the suggested correction is "93". Submitted by Kevin Hanit. | |||||||||||
To register as a person researching someone on this page click here.
Go to: Subdistrict Number: a-24 District: TORONTO (Centre) (City/Cité) National: Canada.
Quick search for possible matches to 1911 Census
All data on this site is copyrighted, use for personal research is free.
Redistribution requires permission: email census@automatedgenealogy.com