Note: this index is only a partial transcription of the original form, see the image for the complete census data.
indicates a note applies to this line, see the bottom of the page.
-> If you find a transcription error on this page please use the proof page to verify the error is in the transcription and not the original, and to report it.

L i n e   #	Numbered in order of visitation		Personal Description								Links
	H o u s e	Family or House- hold	Name of each person in family or household on 31st March, 1901.	Sex.	C o l o u r	Relationship to head of family or household.	Single, married, widowed or divorced.	Month and date of birth.	Year of birth.	Age at last birthday.
	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
1		144	Adams Ambroise	M		Son	S			10	01
2		144	Adams Stephen	M		Son	S			8
3		144	Adams Patrick	M		Son	S			6
4		144	Adams Mary Jane	F		Daughter	S			4	01
5		145	Manville William	M		Head	M			36
6		145	Manville Jane	F		Wife	M			30
7		146	Bruyere Gabriel	M		Head	M			22
8		146	Bruyere Veronique	F		Wife	M			22
9		146	Bruyere Mary Jane	F		Daughter	S
10		147	Manville Nicholas(?)	M		Head	M			28
11		147	Manville Verginia(?)	F		Wife	M			21
12		147	Manville Mary	F		Daughter	S
13		148	Ojibway Wakabeaase(?)	M		Head	M			25
14		148	Ojibway Mamascowepeek	F		Wife	M			22
15		148	Ojibway Misewaybenase(?)	M		Son	S			3
16		148	Ojibway Agiwtapeek(?)	F		Daughter	S			1
17		149	Ojibway Evewegickoke(?)	F		Head	W			70
18		150	Dubois J. H.(?)	M		Head	S			24
19		151	Ojibway Kashewawanee(?)	M		Head	M			45
20		151	Ojibway Kakeshecapoweke	F		Wife	M			45
21		151	Ojibway Paskenacapoweke(?)	F		Daughter	S			20
22		151	Ojibway Matwacomekooke	F		Daughter	S			17
23		151	Ojibway Shanowequon	M		Son	S			15
24		151	Ojibway Natawaywetung(?)	M		Son	S			13
25		151	Ojibway Necanecapoweke	F		Daughter	S			11
26		151	Ojibway Paconucapoweke(?)	F		Daughter	S			9
27		151	Ojibway Masenatapeeke	F		Daughter	S			7
28		151	Ojibway Mayawosake	F		Daughter	S			5
29		151	Ojibway Wachanemepenase(?)	M		Son	S			3
30		152	Ojibway Ahwanegesick(?)	M		Head	M			55
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50

Field Correction Notes on this page

Field correction notes are suggested changes offered by a proofreader or user, they should not be considered authoritative. If the transcriber agrees with the suggestion they will change the line. Notes for changes that have been made are removed periodically. The presence of an uncorrected note is an extra prompt to the user to consult the image. It is always good practice to confirm the accuracy of the transcription by consulting the image.

Field Value Correction Note
1		144	Adams	Ambroise	M		Son	S			10
On line 1, the value for the household field is "144", the suggested correction is "143". The following comment was attached: "The importance of the household number in our index is in grouping people into households, so what the number is is less important than that all the members of a given household have the same,& preferably unique number"
Field Value Correction Note
2		144	Adams	Stephen	M		Son	S			8
On line 2, the value for the household field is "144", the suggested correction is "143". The following comment was attached: Please read Transcription tips & guidelines re household numbers quoted for correction to line 1.
Field Value Correction Note
3		144	Adams	Patrick	M		Son	S			6
On line 3, the value for the household field is "144", the suggested correction is "143". The following comment was attached: Please read Transcription tips & guidelines re household numbers quoted for correction to line 1.
Field Value Correction Note
4		144	Adams	Mary Jane	F		Daughter	S			4
On line 4, the value for the household field is "144", the suggested correction is "143". The following comment was attached: Please read Transcription tips & guidelines re household numbers quoted for correction to line 1.
Field Value Correction Note
18		150	Dubois	J. H.(?)	M		Head	S			24
On line 18, the value for the givens field is "J. H.(?)", the suggested correction is "J. H.".
This correction was evaluated by dsargins: I have checked the image of the original form and the correct value is debatable but I think the transcribed value is more likely to be correct. This comment was added: It seems possible to me that it is 'St.' as in Saint rather than 'H' so I think the '?' should stand

To register as a person researching someone on this page click here.

Go to: Subdistrict Number: XX-3 District: ALGOMA National: Canada.

Quick search for possible matches to 1911 Census

All data on this site is copyrighted, use for personal research is free.
Redistribution requires permission: email census@automatedgenealogy.com