Site Home Linking Message Boards Help | Automated Genealogy | Census Indices: 1901 1906 1911 1852CA 1851NB |
|
|
Note: this index is only a partial transcription of the original form, see the image for the complete census data.
indicates a note applies to this line, see the bottom of the page.
If you find a transcription error on this page please use the
proof page
to verify the error is in the transcription and not the original, and to report it.
L i n e # |
Numbered in order of visitation | Personal Description | Links | ||||||||||
H o u s e |
Family or House- hold |
Name of each person in family or household on 31st March, 1901. | Sex. | C o l o u r |
Relationship to head of family or household. |
Single, married, widowed or divorced. |
Month and date of birth. | Year of birth. | Age at last birthday. | ||||
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 130 | Boyle James | M | Brother | S | Jul 6 | 1862 |
|
|||||
2 | 131 | Deforest Alfred | M | Head | M | Dec 15 | 1866 |
|
|||||
3 | 131 | Deforest Mamie | F | Wife | M | Mar 6 | 1876 |
|
|||||
4 | 131 | Deforest William | M | Son | S | Mar 27 | 1886 |
|
|||||
5 | 131 | Deforest Co????dia | F | Daughter | S | Oct 14 | 1890 |
|
|||||
6 | 131 | Deforest E?zina | F | Daughter | S | Jan 21 | 1893 |
|
|||||
7 | 132 | Nicholson Malcolm? | M | Head | M | May 9 | 1858 |
|
01 | ||||
8 | 132 | Nicholson Jean | F | Wife | M | Apr 18 | 1858 |
|
01 | ||||
9 | 132 | Nicholson John A. | M | Son | S | Nov 2 | 1879 |
|
01 | ||||
10 | 133 | Aitkins William | M | Head | M | Feb 19 | 1863 |
|
|||||
11 | 133 | Aitkins Bella | F | Wife | M | Jun 16 | 1870 |
|
|||||
12 | 133 | Aitkins Lillian E. | F | Daughter | S | Sep 19 | 1891 |
|
|||||
13 | 133 | Aitkins William J. | M | Son | S | Oct 20 | 1893 |
|
|||||
14 | 133 | Aitkins Herbert | M | Son | S | Apr 17 | 1895 |
|
|||||
15 | 133 | Aitkins Raymond G.E. | M | Son | S | Oct 7 | 1897 |
|
|||||
16 | 133 | Aitkins James A. | M | Son | S | Jul 18 | 1900 |
|
|||||
17 | 134 | Seman Allan G. | M | Head | M | Mar 8 | 1857 |
|
|||||
18 | 134 | Seman Sarah J. | F | Wife | M | Mar 12 | 1858 |
|
|||||
19 | 134 | Seman A. Grant | M | Son | S | Aug 24 | 1887 |
|
|||||
20 | 134 | Seman Irvine N. | M | Son | S | Nov 27 | 1892 |
|
|||||
21 | 134 | Seman R. Lloyd | M | Son | S | Jul 19 | 1895 |
|
|||||
22 | 134 | Seman Violet M. | F | Daughter | S | May 29 | 1897 |
|
|||||
23 | 134 | Davidson Emily | F | Domestic | S | Sep 12 | 1877 |
|
|||||
24 | 135 | Cote Edmond | M | Head | M | Mar 19 | 1862 |
|
|||||
25 | 135 | Cote F???? | F | Wife | M | Jan 13 | 1873 |
|
|||||
26 | 135 | Cote Peter | M | Son | S | Oct 9 | 1888 |
|
|||||
27 | 135 | Cote Wilford | M | Son | S | Dec 11 | 1892 |
|
|||||
28 | 135 | Cote Joseph | M | Son | S | Jan 23 | 1894 |
|
|||||
29 | 135 | Cote A??il | M | Son | S | Oct 29 | 1896 |
|
|||||
30 | 136 | Willette John | M | Head | M | Apr 28 | 1868 |
|
|||||
31 | 136 | Willette Elizabeth | F | Wife | M | Jan 23 | 1862 |
|
|||||
32 | 136 | Willette Mary J. | F | Daughter | S | Apr 15 | 1886 |
|
|||||
33 | 136 | Willette Albert | M | Son | S | Apr 4 | 1891 |
|
|||||
34 | 136 | Willette Agnes | F | Daughter | S | May 23 | 1895 |
|
|||||
35 | 136 | Willette Mary L. | F | Daughter | S | Aug 23 | 1897 |
|
|||||
36 | 136 | Hearn Francis | M | Father in law | W | May 25 | 1813 |
|
|||||
37 | 137 | Stiver Joseph | M | Head | M | Jan 1 | 1863 |
|
|||||
38 | 137 | Kirkness Rosie | F | Domestic | S | Apr 7 | 1894 |
|
|||||
39 | 137 | Whitehead Mary A. | F | Boarder | S | May 13 | 1882 |
|
|||||
40 | 137 | Stiver Harriet | F | Wife | M | Aug 16 | 1866 |
|
|||||
41 | 138 | Vigars William | M | Head | M | Jul 15 | 1842 |
|
|||||
42 | 138 | Vigars Mary | F | Wife | M | Mar 31 | 1846 |
|
|||||
43 | 138 | Vigars Elsie | F | Daughter | S | Feb 14 | 1878 |
|
|||||
44 | 139 | McConnell James | M | Head | M | Feb 11 | 1872 |
|
01 | ||||
45 | 139 | McConnell Annie | F | Wife | M | Dec 1 | 1873 |
|
|||||
46 | 140 | Montgomery William G. | M | Head | M | Jul 5 | 1862 |
|
01 | ||||
47 | 140 | Montgomery Nettie? A. | F | Wife | M | Aug 27 | 1863 |
|
|||||
48 | 140 | Mo? Almina R. | F | Sister in law | W | Sep 6 | 1865 |
|
|||||
49 | 140 | Mo? Glaydis? | F | neice | S | Sep 22 | 1889 |
|
|||||
50 | 140 | Montgomery L. | M | Son | S | Oct 3 | 1893 |
|
01 |
The following note applies to line 7:
'I think the age at the last birthday should be 43.' |
The following note applies to line 8:
'I think the age at the last birthday should be 43.' |
The following note applies to line 36:
'This line is struck out.' |
The following note applies to line 38:
'I think the year of birth should be 1884.' |
In household 136, the enumerator wrote the surname as 'Willette', a suggested alternative surname is 'Ouellette'. The person suggesting the alternative surname provided this comment: 'French name - Ou sounds like W.'.
Field correction notes are suggested changes offered by a proofreader or user, they should not be considered authoritative. If the transcriber agrees with the suggestion they will change the line. Notes for changes that have been made are removed periodically. The presence of an uncorrected note is an extra prompt to the user to consult the image. It is always good practice to confirm the accuracy of the transcription by consulting the image.
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
5 | 131 | Deforest | Co????dia | F | Daughter | S | Oct 14 | 1890 | 11 | ||
On line 5, the value for the givens field is "Co????dia", the suggested correction is "Cossildia?". | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
7 | 132 | Nicholson | Malcolm? | M | Head | M | May 9 | 1858 | 33 | ||
On line 7,
the value for the givens
field is "Malcolm?",
the suggested correction is "Malcolm".
The following comment was attached: Definitely Malcolm | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
11 | 133 | Aitkins | Bella | F | Wife | M | Jun 16 | 1870 | 30 | ||
On line 11, the value for the givens field is "Bella", the suggested correction is "Belle". | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
15 | 133 | Aitkins | Raymond G.E. | M | Son | S | Oct 7 | 1897 | 3 | ||
On line 15, the value for the givens field is "Raymond G.E.", the suggested correction is "Reynold G.E.". | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
25 | 135 | Cote | F???? | F | Wife | M | Jan 13 | 1873 | 28 | ||
On line 25, the value for the givens field is "F????", the suggested correction is "Flemier?". | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
29 | 135 | Cote | A??il | M | Son | S | Oct 29 | 1896 | 4 | ||
On line 29, the value for the givens field is "A??il", the suggested correction is "Au??il". | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
48 | 140 | Mo? | Almina R. | F | Sister in law | W | Sep 6 | 1865 | 35 | ||
On line 48, the value for the surname field is "Mo??", the suggested correction is "Morre?". | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
48 | 140 | Mo? | Almina R. | F | Sister in law | W | Sep 6 | 1865 | 35 | ||
On line 48, the value for the surname field is "Mo??", the suggested correction is "Moore". | |||||||||||
This correction was evaluated by Stacey Helena Doran: I have checked the image of the original form and the correct value is debatable but I think the transcribed value is more likely to be correct. | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
48 | 140 | Mo? | Almina R. | F | Sister in law | W | Sep 6 | 1865 | 35 | ||
On line 48, the value for the otherRelationship field is "???? Sister", the suggested correction is "Sister-in-law". | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
48 | 140 | Mo? | Almina R. | F | Sister in law | W | Sep 6 | 1865 | 35 | ||
On line 48, the value for the givens field is "Al???? R.", the suggested correction is "Almina? R.". | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
49 | 140 | Mo? | Glaydis? | F | neice | S | Sep 22 | 1889 | 12 | ||
On line 49, the value for the otherRelationship field is "?", the suggested correction is "Niece". | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
49 | 140 | Mo? | Glaydis? | F | neice | S | Sep 22 | 1889 | 12 | ||
On line 49, the value for the surname field is "Mo??", the suggested correction is "Moore". | |||||||||||
This correction was evaluated by Stacey Helena Doran: I have checked the image of the original form and the correct value is debatable but I think the transcribed value is more likely to be correct. | |||||||||||
To register as a person researching someone on this page click here.
Go to: Subdistrict Number: l(2)-2 District: ALGOMA National: Canada.
Quick search for possible matches to 1911 Census
All data on this site is copyrighted, use for personal research is free.
Redistribution requires permission: email census@automatedgenealogy.com