Note: this index is only a partial transcription of the original form, see the image for the complete census data.
indicates a note applies to this line, see the bottom of the page.
-> If you find a transcription error on this page please use the proof page to verify the error is in the transcription and not the original, and to report it.

L i n e   #	Numbered in order of visitation		Personal Description								Links
	H o u s e	Family or House- hold	Name of each person in family or household on 31st March, 1901.	Sex.	C o l o u r	Relationship to head of family or household.	Single, married, widowed or divorced.	Month and date of birth.	Year of birth.	Age at last birthday.
	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
1		63	Rimstre? Samuel	M		Lodger	S	Jan 17	1879	22
2		63	Morgan George	M		Lodger	S	Oct 2	1865	35
3		63	Jamny Joe	M		Lodger	S		1864	37
4		63	Wamar Jacobson	M		Lodger	S	Jan 7	1866	35
5		63	Burleigh? Charles	M		waiter?	M	Feb 1	1879	22
6		63	Burleigh John	M		Lodger	W	Jan 10		46
7		63	Burleigh Ida M	F		Wife	M	May 9	1879	22
8		63	Burleigh Annie F M	F		Daughter	S	Oct 7	1900
9		63	Binda Fra?	M		Lodger	S	Apr 23	1870	31
10		63	Johnston Joe	M		Lodger	S	Apr 13	1873	27
11		63	Laurey L	M		Lodger	S	Nov 1	1865	35
12		63	Faming George	M		Lodger	S		1857	44
13		63	Lyons Fred V	M		Lodger	S	Sep	1870	30
14		63	Floon David	M		Head	S		1848	53
15		64	Woonworth Henry	M		Head	M	Sep 27	1867	33
16		64	Woonworth May ?	F		Wife	M	Oct 1	1874	26
17		64	Woonworth Henry John	M		Son	S	Feb 9	1899	2
18		64	Woonworth Allice R	F		Daughter	S	Feb 1	1896	5
19		64	Woonworth Elizabeth	F		Daughter	S	Apr 1	1897	4
20		65	Fynlayson John W	M		Head	M	Oct 20	1871	30
21		65	Fynlayson Sarah	F		Wife	M		1881	24
22		65	Fynlayson Sarah	F		Daughter	S	Sep 15	1898	3
23		65	Fynlayson Mary J	F		Daughter	S	Feb 15	1886	15
24		66	Finlayson Nixon	M		Head	M	Nov 18	1868	33
25		66	Finlayson Elisabeth	F		Wife	M	Aug	1866	36
26		66	Finlayson John	M		Son	S	Apr 15	1884	17	01
27		66	Finlayson Hector J P	M		Son	S	May 11	1892	9
28		66	Finlayson Nicol D	M		Son	S	Apr 28	1894	7
29		66	Finlayson George W S	M		Son	S	May 13	1896	5
30		66	Finlayson Cristina	F		Daughter	S	Mar 15	1886	15
31		66	Finlayson Hilda E	F		Daughter	S	Aug 28	1888	13
32		66	Finlayson Bella	F		Daughter	S	Jun 5	1890	11
33		66	Finlayson Victoria M	F		Daughter	S	May 24	1900	1
34		66	Ross Charles W	M		Lodger	S	Aug 17	1869	32
35		66	Rowell Thomas	M		Lodger	S	Mar	1859	45
36		66	Schmidt Carol?	M		Lodger	S		1854	46
37		66	Schmidt Thersa	F		Wife	S		1874	26
38		67	Parks John	M		Head	M	Oct 19	1872	28
39		67	Parks Sarah	F		Wife	M	Apr 20	1875	25
40		67	Parks John G	M		Son	S	Mar 26	1892	9
41		67	Parks Thomas	M		Son	S	Sep 16	1894	7
42		67	Parks William	M		Son	S	Feb 21	1896	5
43		67	Parks Archabald?	M		Son	S	Mar 11	1898	3
44		67	Parks Miggie	F		Daughter	S	Oct 19	1900	1
45		68	Fell Kenneth M	M		Head	M	Oct 15	1864	36
46		68	Fell Jane	F		Wife	M	Sep 1	1864	36
47		68	Fell Kenneth C J	M		Son	S	Apr 1	1887	14
48		68	Fell Robert H	M		Son	S	Jul 8	1889	11
49		68	Fell Arther J B	M		Son	S	Nov 22	1890	10
50		68	Fell Allice Jane	F		Daughter	S	Apr 21	1888	13

Line Notes On This Page

The following note applies to line 7:

'Suggest lines 7 and 8 are "lodgers" as is line 6 in relation to "head"'

The following note applies to line 12:

'Suggest surname may also be "Farning"'

The following note applies to line 15:

'Suggest surname may also be "Woodworth"'

The following note applies to line 20:

'Sorry, correct as originally transcribed'

The following note applies to line 21:

'I have to transcribe the entry the way it is on the film even if it is known to be wrong. '

The following note applies to line 23:

'I have to transcribe the entry the way it is on the film even if it is known to be wrong. '

The following note applies to line 23:

'This is my grandmother and she was born in 1900, she was only 15 months old not 15 years old as it is written here'

Field Correction Notes on this page

Field correction notes are suggested changes offered by a proofreader or user, they should not be considered authoritative. If the transcriber agrees with the suggestion they will change the line. Notes for changes that have been made are removed periodically. The presence of an uncorrected note is an extra prompt to the user to consult the image. It is always good practice to confirm the accuracy of the transcription by consulting the image.

Field Value Correction Note
1		63	Rimstre?	Samuel	M		Lodger	S	Jan 17	1879	22
On line 1, the value for the surname field is "Rustin", the suggested correction is "Rimstra?".
This correction was evaluated by Diane Shaw: I have checked the image of the original form and the correct value is debatable but I think the transcribed value is more likely to be correct.
Field Value Correction Note
1		63	Rimstre?	Samuel	M		Lodger	S	Jan 17	1879	22
On line 1, the value for the surname field is "Rustin", the suggested correction is "Rimstra?".
This correction was evaluated by Diane Shaw: A change other than the suggested correction has been made, I have checked the image of the original form and agree with the current value
Field Value Correction Note
5		63	Burleigh?	Charles	M		waiter?	M	Feb 1	1879	22
On line 5, the value for the surname field is "?", the suggested correction is "Birley?".
This correction was evaluated by Diane Shaw: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original.
Field Value Correction Note
5		63	Burleigh?	Charles	M		waiter?	M	Feb 1	1879	22
On line 5, the value for the relationship field is "", the suggested correction is " ".
This correction was evaluated by Diane Shaw: A change other than the suggested correction has been made, I have checked the image of the original form and agree with the current value
Field Value Correction Note
5		63	Burleigh?	Charles	M		waiter?	M	Feb 1	1879	22
On line 5, the value for the day field is "10", the suggested correction is "01". Submitted anonymously.
This correction was evaluated by Diane Shaw: The suggested change has been made
Field Value Correction Note
5		63	Burleigh?	Charles	M		waiter?	M	Feb 1	1879	22
On line 5, the value for the surname field is "?", the suggested correction is "Burleigh".
This correction was evaluated by Diane Shaw: The suggested change has been made
Field Value Correction Note
9		63	Binda	Fra?	M		Lodger	S	Apr 23	1870	31
On line 9, the value for the givens field is "Fra?", the suggested correction is "Fred".
This correction was evaluated by Diane Shaw: A change other than the suggested correction has been made, I have checked the image of the original form and agree with the current value
Field Value Correction Note
13		63	Lyons	Fred V	M		Lodger	S	Sep	1870	30
On line 13, the value for the givens field is "Fred V", the suggested correction is "Fredr' V".
This correction was evaluated by Diane Shaw: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original.
Field Value Correction Note
21		65	Fynlayson	Sarah	F		Wife	M		1881	24
On line 21, the value for the year field is "1881", the suggested correction is "1880". The following comment was attached: If Sarah Fynlayson was born if 1881 and this censes was in 1901 she should be listed as 20 years old
This correction was evaluated by Diane Shaw: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original. This comment was added: I have to transcribe the entry the way it is on the film even if it is known to be wrong.
Field Value Correction Note
21		65	Fynlayson	Sarah	F		Wife	M		1881	24
On line 21, the value for the year field is "[ ]", the suggested correction is "188?".
This correction was evaluated by Diane Shaw: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original.
Field Value Correction Note
23		65	Fynlayson	Mary J	F		Daughter	S	Feb 15	1886	15
On line 23, the value for the year field is "1886", the suggested correction is "1900".
This correction was evaluated by Diane Shaw: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original.
Field Value Correction Note
23		65	Fynlayson	Mary J	F		Daughter	S	Feb 15	1886	15
On line 23, the value for the relationship field is "Daughter", the suggested correction is "Head". Submitted anonymously. The following comment was attached: My grandmother was Mary Jane Fynlayson born Feb 15 1900 could this be her?
This correction was evaluated by Diane Shaw: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original.
Field Value Correction Note
23		65	Fynlayson	Mary J	F		Daughter	S	Feb 15	1886	15
On line 23, the value for the year field is "1886", the suggested correction is "1900".
This correction was evaluated by Diane Shaw: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original. This comment was added: I have to transcribe the entry the way it is on the film even if it is known to be wrong.
Field Value Correction Note
23		65	Fynlayson	Mary J	F		Daughter	S	Feb 15	1886	15
On line 23, the value for the year field is "1886", the suggested correction is "1900". The following comment was attached: This is my grandmother Mary Jane Fynlayson she was born in 1900 her mother Sarah listed here as being born in 1881 would have been 5 years old when my grandmother was born to her
This correction was evaluated by Diane Shaw: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original. This comment was added: I have to transcribe the entry the way it is on the film even if it is known to be wrong.
Field Value Correction Note
23		65	Fynlayson	Mary J	F		Daughter	S	Feb 15	1886	15
On line 23, the value for the year field is "1886", the suggested correction is "1900". Submitted anonymously.
This correction was evaluated by Diane Shaw: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original.

To register as a person researching someone on this page click here.

Go to: Subdistrict Number: y(2) District: ALGOMA National: Canada.

Quick search for possible matches to 1911 Census

All data on this site is copyrighted, use for personal research is free.
Redistribution requires permission: email census@automatedgenealogy.com