Note: this index is only a partial transcription of the original form, see the image for the complete census data.
indicates a note applies to this line, see the bottom of the page.
-> If you find a transcription error on this page please use the proof page to verify the error is in the transcription and not the original, and to report it.

L i n e   #	Numbered in order of visitation		Personal Description								Links
	H o u s e	Family or House- hold	Name of each person in family or household on 31st March, 1901.	Sex.	C o l o u r	Relationship to head of family or household.	Single, married, widowed or divorced.	Month and date of birth.	Year of birth.	Age at last birthday.
	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
1		107	Bickel Maggie	F		Daughter	S	Mar 20	1900	1
2		107	Huber Jacob	M		Servant	S	Feb 15	1882	19
3		108	Eidt Conrad	M		Head	M	Apr 21	1864	36	01
4		108	Eidt Caroline	F		Wife	M	Sep 26	1865	35
5		108	Losch Alvin	M		?	S	Jun 30	1892	8
6		108	Schildroth Annie	F		Domestic	S	Apr 1	1882	19
7		108	Dietz Lizze	F		Domestic	S		1862	38
8		108	Schroeder William	M		Lodger	S	Aug 14	1876	24
9		109	Dippel Jacob	M		Head	M	Dec 10	1854	47
10		109	Dippel Mary	F		Wife	M	May 6	1862	38
11		109	Dippel Magdlena	F		Daughter	S	Mar 5	1887	14
12		109	Dippel Peter	M		Son	S	Mar 27	1889	12
13		109	Dippel Fredericka	F		Daughter	S	Aug 5	1891	9
14		109	Dippel Wilfred	M		Son	S	Mar 17	1894	7
15		110	Hauch J. T.	M		Head	M	Apr 17	1826	74
16		110	Hauch Cathriena	F		Wife	M	Oct 20	1841	59
17		111	Huber Simon	M		Head	S	Oct 20	1878	22
18		112	Merkel Sarah	F		Servant	S	Nov 15	1879	21
19		113	Reuber William	M		Servant	S	Jan 17	1887	14
20		114	Emel Ignatius	M		Head	S	Sep 15	1879	21
21		115	Hesch Peter	M		Head	W	Oct 24	1820	80
22		115	Hesch Victora	F		Daughter	S	Oct 12	1867	34
23		116	Sister M. Amabdes	F		Head	S	May 12		54
24		116	Sister M. Johanna	F		Inmate	S	Oct 17		41
25		116	Sister Berlindis	F		Inmate	S	Feb 2		25
26		116	Sister Bartona	F		Inmate	S	May 5		30
27		117	Kunemann Geo	M			S
28		118	Kunemann Frank	M			S			20
29		119	Kunemann Alex	M		Head	M	Apr 25	1843	58
30		119	Kunemann Mary	F		Wife	M	May 11	1852	49
31		119	Kunemann Ignatius	M		Son	S	Jul 31	1875	23
32		119	Kunemann Maggie	F		Daughter	S	Jul 23	1882	18
33		119	Kunemann George	M		Son	S	Jan 21	1885	16	01
34		119	Kunemann Catie	F		Daughter	S	Feb 23	1889	12
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50

Line Notes On This Page

The following note applies to line 9:

'Birth year and age do not match Census date 15 Apr 1901'

The following note applies to line 22:

'Birth year and age do not match Census date 15 Apr 1901'

The following note applies to line 23:

'Birth year and age do not match Census date 15 Apr 1901'

The following note applies to line 23:

'I'm not sure how anyone would find these nuns as they didn't use last names. Relationship "inmate" sounds interesting'

The following note applies to line 23:

'Transcriber's note: Presumably this person was a nun, so her surname was not "Sister". I've transcribed this entry the way it was written.'

The following note applies to line 24:

'See note for line 23'

The following note applies to line 25:

'See note for line 23.'

The following note applies to line 26:

'See note for line 23.'

The following note applies to line 31:

'Birth year and age do not match Census date 15 Apr 1901'

Field Correction Notes on this page

Field correction notes are suggested changes offered by a proofreader or user, they should not be considered authoritative. If the transcriber agrees with the suggestion they will change the line. Notes for changes that have been made are removed periodically. The presence of an uncorrected note is an extra prompt to the user to consult the image. It is always good practice to confirm the accuracy of the transcription by consulting the image.

Field Value Correction Note
5		108	Losch	Alvin	M		?	S	Jun 30	1892	8
On line 5, the value for the otherRelationship field is "?", the suggested correction is "Adopted". The following comment was attached: Suggest this is a misspelling of "Adopted"
This correction was evaluated by Margaret Cox: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original.
Field Value Correction Note
5		108	Losch	Alvin	M		?	S	Jun 30	1892	8
On line 5, the value for the otherRelationship field is "?", the suggested correction is "Adopted". The following comment was attached: Suggest this is a misspelling of "Adopted"
This correction was evaluated by Margaret Cox: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original. This comment was added: This word could also be "Doubted", which makes no sense to me.

To register as a person researching someone on this page click here.

Go to: Subdistrict Number: b-7 District: BRUCE (East/Est) National: Canada.

Quick search for possible matches to 1911 Census

All data on this site is copyrighted, use for personal research is free.
Redistribution requires permission: email census@automatedgenealogy.com