Note: this index is only a partial transcription of the original form, see the image for the complete census data.
indicates a note applies to this line, see the bottom of the page.
If you find a transcription error on this page please use the
proof page
to verify the error is in the transcription and not the original, and to report it.
|
48 |
Munger Mérée |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Feb 28 |
1870 |
31
|
|
|
|
|
48 |
Munger Anna |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
May 25 |
1875 |
25
|
|
|
|
|
48 |
Munger Ludger |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Jan 9 |
1899 |
2
|
|
|
|
|
48 |
Munger Louis Arm |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Dec 23 |
1899 |
1
|
|
|
|
|
48 |
Brassard Alexis |
M |
|
Father |
M |
Feb 24 |
1842 |
59
|
|
|
|
|
48 |
Brassard Louise |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
May 8 |
1842 |
58
|
|
|
|
|
48 |
Brassard Marie |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Dec 25 |
1872 |
28
|
|
|
|
|
49 |
Lavoie Télesphore |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Aug 29 |
1832 |
67
|
|
|
01* |
|
49 |
Lavoie Louise |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Oct 30 |
1842 |
59
|
|
|
01* |
|
49 |
Lavoie Anna |
F |
|
Daughter |
W |
Feb 13 |
1872 |
29
|
|
|
01* |
|
49 |
Lavoie Alice |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Oct 5 |
1873 |
27
|
|
|
01* |
|
49 |
Lavoie Dianna |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Dec 24 |
1875 |
26
|
|
|
01* |
|
49 |
Lavoie T Louis |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Sep 30 |
1875 |
25
|
|
|
01* |
|
49 |
Lavoie Eugène |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Mar 23 |
1878 |
23
|
|
|
01* |
|
49 |
Lavoie Simon |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Nov 7 |
1878 |
21
|
|
|
01* |
|
49 |
Lavoie Joseph |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Apr 22 |
1881 |
19
|
|
|
01 |
|
49 |
Lavoie Joséphine |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Aug 25 |
1883 |
17
|
|
|
|
|
49 |
Lavoie Hélène |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Dec 19 |
1885 |
14
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
Tremblay Hector |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Jan 21 |
1859 |
42
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
Tremblay Marie |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Dec 25 |
186? |
34
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
Tremblay Marie |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Nov 1 |
1883 |
17
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
Tremblay Émilie |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Mar 11 |
1888 |
13
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
Tremblay Thomas |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Jan 21 |
1890 |
11
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
Tremblay Théophil |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Dec 9 |
1890 |
10
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
Tremblay Cécile |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Dec 12 |
1893 |
7
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
Tremblay Joseph |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Oct 4 |
1897 |
4
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
Tremblay Eugène |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Dec 1 |
1898 |
2
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
Tremblay Elgard |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Oct 10 |
1880 |
11
|
|
|
|
|
51 |
Desbiens Nérée |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Aug 31 |
1878 |
32
|
|
|
|
|
51 |
Desbiens Emélia |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Oct 5 |
1865 |
35
|
|
|
|
|
51 |
Desbiens Hélène |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Sep 7 |
1890 |
10
|
|
|
|
|
51 |
Desbiens Joseph |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Mar 7 |
1892 |
9
|
|
|
|
|
51 |
Desbiens Dianna |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Nov 12 |
1894 |
6
|
|
|
|
|
51 |
Desbiens Eugène |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Apr 18 |
1896 |
4
|
|
|
|
|
51 |
Desbiens Ernest |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Feb 7 |
1899 |
2
|
|
|
|
|
52 |
Simard Etienne |
M |
|
Head |
W |
Nov 2 |
1833 |
66
|
|
|
|
|
52 |
Simard Jean |
M |
|
Son |
M |
Dec 14 |
1868 |
32
|
|
|
|
|
52 |
Simard Anna |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Mar 25 |
1876 |
25
|
|
|
|
|
52 |
Simard Joseph |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Mar 8 |
1896 |
5
|
|
|
|
|
52 |
Simard Cécile |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Nov 23 |
1897 |
3
|
|
|
|
|
52 |
Simard Marie Bla |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Oct 17 |
1898 |
2
|
|
|
|
|
52 |
Simard Delphine |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Mar 24 |
1901 |
7 jours
|
|
|
|
|
52 |
Simard Lidia |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Feb 10 |
1887 |
14
|
|
|
|
|
52 |
Munger Georges |
M |
|
Head |
M |
May 26 |
1825 |
75
|
|
|
|
|
52 |
Munger Adélaide |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Apr 1 |
1833 |
67
|
|
|
|
|
53 |
Munger Joseph |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Oct 6 |
1854 |
45
|
|
|
|
|
53 |
Munger ?édia |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Jan 23 |
1872 |
29
|
|
|
|
|
53 |
Munger Calix |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Oct 25 |
1875 |
25
|
|
|
|
|
53 |
Munger Aimée |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Apr 10 |
1878 |
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Line Notes On This Page
The following note applies to line 15:
'1878 ne coincide pas avec l'âge' |
The following note applies to line 20:
'devrait être 1867 mais semble plus à 1861' |
Field Correction Notes on this page
Field correction notes are suggested changes offered by a
proofreader or user, they should not be considered authoritative. If
the transcriber agrees with the suggestion they will change the line.
Notes for changes that have been made are removed periodically. The
presence of an uncorrected note is an extra prompt to the user to
consult the image. It is always good practice to confirm the accuracy
of the transcription by consulting the image.
Field Value Correction Note |
4 |
|
48 |
Munger | Louis Arm |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Dec 23 |
1899 |
1 |
On line 4,
the value for the year
field is "1899",
the suggested correction is "1900". Submitted by Lucien Laberge.
The following comment was attached: il y a eu barbouillage pour 1900 par dessus 1899
|
This correction was evaluated by Michel Dubois:
I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
47 |
|
53 |
Munger | ?édia |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Jan 23 |
1872 |
29 |
On line 47,
the value for the givens
field is "?édia",
the suggested correction is "Cédia". Submitted by Lucien Laberge.
|
This correction was evaluated by Michel Dubois:
I have checked the image of the original form and the correct value is debatable but I think the transcribed value is more likely to be correct.
|
|
To register as a person researching someone on this page
click here.
Go to: Subdistrict Number: p-1
District: CHICOUTIMI & SAGUENAY
National: Canada.
Quick search for possible matches to 1911 Census
All data on this site is copyrighted, use for personal research is free.
Redistribution requires permission: email census@automatedgenealogy.com