Note: this index is only a partial transcription of the original form, see the image for the complete census data.
indicates a note applies to this line, see the bottom of the page.
-> If you find a transcription error on this page please use the proof page to verify the error is in the transcription and not the original, and to report it.

L i n e   #	Numbered in order of visitation		Personal Description								Links
	H o u s e	Family or House- hold	Name of each person in family or household on 31st March, 1901.	Sex.	C o l o u r	Relationship to head of family or household.	Single, married, widowed or divorced.	Month and date of birth.	Year of birth.	Age at last birthday.
	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
1		23	Gibson Mary	F		Daughter	S	Jul 8	1896	4	01
2		23	Gibson Irene	F		Daughter	S	Aug 3	1899	1	01
3		24	Lathwell William T	M		Head	M		1845	55
4		24	Lathwell Annie	F		Wife	M		1845	55
5		24	Lathwell Harry	M		Son	S		1878	22
6		24	Lathwell Annie	F		Daughter	S		1880	20
7		25	Gibson Donald W	M		Head	M	Sep 5	1877	23
8		25	Gibson May	F		Wife	M	Jun 28	1883	17
9		25	Gibson Henry R	M		Son	S	Mar 23	1899	2
10		26	Robertson Archibald	M		Head	M	Oct 23	1863	37	01
11		26	Robertson Mary	F		Wife	M	Jul 4	1873	28
12		27	Greeley Henry	M		Head	M	Oct 9	1844	56	0*
13		27	Greeley Sarah	F		Wife	M	Jun 30	1848	52	0*
14		27	Greeley ? H.	M		Son	S	Mar 10	1876	25
15		27	Greeley Bert	M		Son	S	Apr 5	1878	22
16		27	Greeley Ida	F		Daughter	S	Jun 3	1884	16	0*
17		27	Greeley Alvin	M		Son	S	Oct 10	1887	13
18		27	Greeley Jack	M		Son	S	Mar 17	1891	10	0*
19		27	Greeley ?	F		Daughter	S	Oct 5	1897	3	0*
20		28	Greeley ?	M		Head	S	Oct 9	1871	24
21		28	McKay Donald	M		Lodger	S	Nov 1	1865	35
22		29	McLachlan John	M		Head	M	Mar 24	1843	58
23		30	Jeffrey Joseph	M		Head	M	Sep 1	1866	34
24		30	Jeffrey Isabella	F		Wife	M	Jul 16	1867	33
25		30	Jeffrey William	M		Son	S	Jun 27	1900	9/12
26		30	Recte James	M		Domestic	S	Sep 12	1888	12
27		31	Wilson James	M		Head	M	May 3	1854	46	01*
28		31	Wilson Jessie	F		Wife	M	May 26	1853	47	01*
29		31	Wilson Robert C.	M		Son	S	Oct 23	1877	23	01
30		31	Wilson James J	M		Son	S	Dec 7	1879	21	0*
31		31	Wilson John W.	M		Son	S	Mar 18	1882	19	0*
32		31	Purdy Eliza	F		Domestic	S	Apr 18	1887	13
33		32	Avison ?	M		Head	S	Jun 12	1873	27
34		32	Avison ?	M		Brother	S	Mar 12	1876	25
35		33	Avison ?	M		Head	M	Oct 29	1866	54	01
36		33	Avison ?	F		Wife	M	Jun 18	1862	38	01
37		33	Avison ?	M		Domestic	S	Oct	1886	14
38		33	Avison ?	M		Son	S	Dec 24	1896	4
39		33	Avison ?	F		Daughter	S	Nov 18	1898	2
40		34	Lofton ?	M		Head	M	Sep 20	1868	32
41		34	Lofton ?	F		Wife	M	Feb 16	1874	26
42		34	Lofton ?	M		Son	S	Mar 27	1896	4
43		34	Lofton ?	M		Son	S	May 7	1897	3
44		34	Lofton ?	M		Son	S	May 1	1890	11/12	0*
45		35	S? ?	M		Head	S	May 15	1870	30
46		36	Gillespie ?	M		Head	M	Jul 12	1854	46	01
47		36	Gillespie ?	F		Wife	M		1856	44	01
48		36	Gillespie ?	M		Son	S	Nov 4	1884	16	01
49		36	Gillespie ?	F		Daughter	S	Sep 10	1885	15	01
50		36	Gillespie ?	M		Son	S	Dec 29	1887	13	01*

Field Correction Notes on this page

Field correction notes are suggested changes offered by a proofreader or user, they should not be considered authoritative. If the transcriber agrees with the suggestion they will change the line. Notes for changes that have been made are removed periodically. The presence of an uncorrected note is an extra prompt to the user to consult the image. It is always good practice to confirm the accuracy of the transcription by consulting the image.

Field Value Correction Note
19		27	Greeley	?	F		Daughter	S	Oct 5	1897	3
On line 19, the value for the givens field is "?", the suggested correction is "Nelda(?)". Submitted by Gerald Peskett. The following comment was attached: Krystal, I queried on the forum whether a correction should be placed for an unreadable name, and was advised if the name could be ascertained via other sources then a correction should be made with a (?) after.
Field Value Correction Note
35		33	Avison	?	M		Head	M	Oct 29	1866	54
On line 35, the value for the givens field is "?", the suggested correction is "William (?) B.". Submitted by Gerald Peskett.
This correction was evaluated by Krystal Tait: I have checked the image of the original form and the correct value is debatable but I think the transcribed value is more likely to be correct.
Field Value Correction Note
36		33	Avison	?	F		Wife	M	Jun 18	1862	38
On line 36, the value for the givens field is "?", the suggested correction is "Jane(?)". Submitted by Gerald Peskett.
This correction was evaluated by Krystal Tait: I have checked the image of the original form and the correct value is debatable but I think the transcribed value is more likely to be correct.
Field Value Correction Note
37		33	Avison	?	M		Domestic	S	Oct	1886	14
On line 37, the value for the surname field is "?", the suggested correction is "Whitner(?)". Submitted by Gerald Peskett. The following comment was attached: Looks like Whitner although I can't find him anyway afterwards
This correction was evaluated by Krystal Tait: I have checked the image of the original form and the correct value is debatable but I think the transcribed value is more likely to be correct.
Field Value Correction Note
41		34	Lofton	?	F		Wife	M	Feb 16	1874	26
On line 41, the value for the givens field is "?", the suggested correction is "Rebecca (?)". Submitted by Gerald Peskett. The following comment was attached: as per Vital Stats page
This correction was evaluated by Krystal Tait: I have checked the image of the original form and the correct value is debatable but I think the transcribed value is more likely to be correct.
Field Value Correction Note
45		35	S?	?	M		Head	S	May 15	1870	30
On line 45, the value for the surname field is "S?", the suggested correction is "Sterling (?)". Submitted by Gerald Peskett.
This correction was evaluated by Krystal Tait: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original.
Field Value Correction Note
46		36	Gillespie	?	M		Head	M	Jul 12	1854	46
On line 46, the value for the givens field is "?", the suggested correction is "Dugald C.(?)". Submitted by Gerald Peskett. The following comment was attached: This is the format for corrections that are unreadable. See forum messages under 1901
This correction was evaluated by Krystal Tait: I have checked the image of the original form and the correct value is debatable but I think the transcribed value is more likely to be correct. This comment was added: There is no way to make out Dugald from what is written here; you should instead add a note that the name might be Dugald
Field Value Correction Note
47		36	Gillespie	?	F		Wife	M		1856	44
On line 47, the value for the givens field is "?", the suggested correction is "Elizabeth (?)". Submitted by Gerald Peskett.
This correction was evaluated by Krystal Tait: I have checked the image of the original form and the correct value is debatable but I think the transcribed value is more likely to be correct.
Field Value Correction Note
48		36	Gillespie	?	M		Son	S	Nov 4	1884	16
On line 48, the value for the givens field is "?", the suggested correction is "William (?)". Submitted by Gerald Peskett.
This correction was evaluated by Krystal Tait: I have checked the image of the original form and the correct value is debatable but I think the transcribed value is more likely to be correct.
Field Value Correction Note
49		36	Gillespie	?	F		Daughter	S	Sep 10	1885	15
On line 49, the value for the givens field is "?", the suggested correction is "Dora (?)". Submitted by Gerald Peskett.
This correction was evaluated by Krystal Tait: I have checked the image of the original form and the correct value is debatable but I think the transcribed value is more likely to be correct.
Field Value Correction Note
50		36	Gillespie	?	M		Son	S	Dec 29	1887	13
On line 50, the value for the givens field is "?", the suggested correction is "James (?)". Submitted by Gerald Peskett.
This correction was evaluated by Krystal Tait: I have checked the image of the original form and the correct value is debatable but I think the transcribed value is more likely to be correct.

To register as a person researching someone on this page click here.

Go to: Subdistrict Number: k-5 District: SELKIRK National: Canada.

Quick search for possible matches to 1911 Census

All data on this site is copyrighted, use for personal research is free.
Redistribution requires permission: email census@automatedgenealogy.com