Note: this index is only a partial transcription of the original form, see the image for the complete census data.
indicates a note applies to this line, see the bottom of the page.
@ next to the line number indicates contact information for someone researching this person, see the bottom of the page.
-> If you find a transcription error on this page please use the proof page to verify the error is in the transcription and not the original, and to report it.

L i n e   #	Numbered in order of visitation		Personal Description								Links
	H o u s e	Family or House- hold	Name of each person in family or household on 31st March, 1901.	Sex.	C o l o u r	Relationship to head of family or household.	Single, married, widowed or divorced.	Month and date of birth.	Year of birth.	Age at last birthday.
	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
1		45	Underwood Mary	F		Head	W	Jul	1829	72	01
2		45	Underwood Hellen	F		Daughter	S	Mar 2	1869	32
3		46	Byers William	M		Head	M	Aug 15	1862	39
4		46	Byers Emma	F		Wife	M	Aug 29	1869	32
5		46	Byers Bella	F		Daughter	S	Jan 15	1891	10	01
6		46	Byers William E	M		Son	S	Nov 12	1893	7
7		46	Byers Maggie E	F		Daughter	S	Jul 15	1895	6
8		46	Byers Hugh	M		Son	S	Jan 7	1897	4
9		46	Byers Mary E	F		Daughter	S	Feb 10	1898	3
10		46	Byers Irene	F		Daughter	S	Oct 16	1899	1
11		47	Barnes Richard	M		Head	M	Oct 15	1877	24
12		47	Barnes Ada	F		Wife	M	Aug 19	1878	23
13		47	Barnes Eldon	M		Son	S	Sep 30	1900	6/12
14		47	Barnes John	M		Father	M	Feb 16	1819	82
15		47	Barnes Sushannah	F		Mother	M	Oct 16	1829	72
16		47	Barnes Frances	F		Sister	S	Mar 11	1854	47
17		48	McKee James	M		Head	M	Aug 17	1865	36	01
18		48	McKee AnnJane	F		Wife	M	Sep 20	1870	30
19		48	McKee Mary Elinor	F		Daughter	S	Oct 12	1894	6
20		48	McKee William S	M		Son	S	Oct 7	1896	4
21		48	McKee James W	M		Son	S	Apr 17	1899	1
22		49	Crawford Alex	M		Head	M	Feb 12	1835	66	01
23		49	Crawford Jane	F		Wife	M	May 6	1851	50
24		49	Crawford Mary	F		Daughter	S	Sep 12	1878	23
25		49	Crawford Reginald	M		Son	S	May 16	1880	21	01
26		49	Crawford Selena	F		Daughter	S	Mar 4	1881	20
27		50	Crawford James	M		Head	M	Jun 28	1863	38	01
28		50	Crawford Mary C	F		Wife	M	Dec 24	1864	37	01
29		50	Crawford Melinda	F		Daughter	S	Nov 11	1885	16
30		50	Crawford Zetta V	F		Daughter	S	Dec 15	1895	6	01
31		51	Crawford Marice	M		Head	M	Dec 12	1858	42	01
32		51	Crawford Melinda	F		Wife	M	Jul 7	1869	33
@ 33		51	Crawford Lillian	F		Daughter	S	May 23	1894	6	01
34		51	Crawford Vera	F		Daughter	S	Jun 2	1895	5	01
35		51	Crawford William	M		Son	S	Sep 2	1898	2	01
36		51	Crawford William	M		Father	W	Aug 7	1830	70
37		52	Loney John	M		Head	M	Jan 25	1860	41
38		52	Loney Elsebth	F		Wife	M	Dec 25	1865	35
39		52	Loney Bert	M		Son	S	Nov 18	1885	15
40		52	Loney Oscar	M		Son	S	Jan 21	1888	13
41		52	Laney Cecil	M		Son	S	Mar 19	1890	11
42		52	Loney Vernon	M		Son	S	Jun 20	1895	6
43		52	Loney Hilda	F		Daughter	S	Sep 12	1897	3
44		53	Courdick Frank	M		Head	M	Aug	1852	48	01
45		53	Courdick Margret A	F		Wife	M	Mar 12	1859	42	01
46		53	Courdick John A	M		Son	S	Aug 28	1883	18
47		53	Courdick Elsebth A	F		Daughter	S	Feb 10	1884	17
48		53	Courdick William F	M		Son	S	Feb 5	1888	13	01
49		53	Courdick Sarah J	F		Daughter	S	May 21	1896	5	01
50		53	Courdick Ann Jane	F		Mother	W	Jun	1820	81

Field Correction Notes on this page

Field correction notes are suggested changes offered by a proofreader or user, they should not be considered authoritative. If the transcriber agrees with the suggestion they will change the line. Notes for changes that have been made are removed periodically. The presence of an uncorrected note is an extra prompt to the user to consult the image. It is always good practice to confirm the accuracy of the transcription by consulting the image.

Field Value Correction Note
6		46	Byers	William E	M		Son	S	Nov 12	1893	7
On line 6, the value for the age field is "7", the suggested correction is "9". Submitted by Cathie Locke. The following comment was attached: I believe it is a '9'
This correction was evaluated by Margaret Cox: I have checked the image of the original form and the correct value is debatable but I think the transcribed value is more likely to be correct. This comment was added: It looks like an intended 9 was changed to a 7.
Field Value Correction Note
6		46	Byers	William E	M		Son	S	Nov 12	1893	7
On line 6, the value for the age field is "7", the suggested correction is "9". Submitted by Cathie Locke. The following comment was attached: I believe it is a '9'
This correction was evaluated by Margaret Cox: I have checked the image of the original form and the correct value is debatable but I think the transcribed value is more likely to be correct. This comment was added: It looks like an intended

Researcher contact information

To register as a person researching someone on this page click here.

Go to: Subdistrict Number: c-2 District: BRUCE (North/Nord) National: Canada.

Quick search for possible matches to 1911 Census

All data on this site is copyrighted, use for personal research is free.
Redistribution requires permission: email census@automatedgenealogy.com