Note: this index is only a partial transcription of the original form, see the image for the complete census data.
indicates a note applies to this line, see the bottom of the page.
If you find a transcription error on this page please use the
proof page
to verify the error is in the transcription and not the original, and to report it.
|
138 |
Long John |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Mar 24 |
1846 |
55
|
|
|
01 |
|
138 |
Long Helen |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Jan 22 |
1858 |
43
|
|
|
01 |
|
138 |
Long Frank |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Aug 4 |
1884 |
16
|
|
|
01 |
|
138 |
Long Fred |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Feb 7 |
1887 |
14
|
|
|
|
|
138 |
Long Mamie |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Mar 1 |
1889 |
12
|
|
|
01 |
|
138 |
Long Helen G. |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Dec 7 |
1890 |
10
|
|
|
|
|
138 |
Long Ethel |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Dec 14 |
1894 |
6
|
|
|
01 |
|
138 |
Long William |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Nov 23 |
1896 |
4
|
|
|
01 |
|
138 |
Long Stanley |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Oct 17 |
1898 |
2
|
|
|
01 |
|
139 |
Carruth Robert |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Jul 15 |
1834 |
66
|
|
|
|
|
139 |
Carruth Mary |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Feb 27 |
1839 |
62
|
|
|
|
|
139 |
Carruth Harriet |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Jan 22 |
1883 |
18
|
|
|
|
|
139 |
Carruth Dewar |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Jun 13 |
1886 |
14
|
|
|
|
|
139 |
Hodgins Jessie |
F |
|
Daughter |
M |
Apr 19 |
1880 |
20
|
|
|
|
|
139 |
Hodgins Frank |
M |
|
Son-in-law |
M |
Mar 9 |
1876 |
25
|
|
|
|
|
140 |
Clink Joseph |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Jun 20 |
1861 |
39
|
|
|
|
|
140 |
Clink Sarah |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Dec 7 |
1865 |
35
|
|
|
|
|
140 |
Clink Beatrice |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Jan 4 |
1892 |
9
|
|
|
|
|
141 |
DeLaHooke James |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Jul 3 |
1848 |
52
|
|
|
|
|
141 |
DeLaHooke Adelaide |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Apr 29 |
1855 |
45
|
|
|
|
|
141 |
DeLaHooke Earnest |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Oct 17 |
1882 |
18
|
|
|
|
|
141 |
DeLaHooke Augusta |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Jun 3 |
1884 |
16
|
|
|
|
|
142 |
Smyth Eliza J. |
F |
|
Head |
W |
Oct 1 |
1858 |
42
|
|
|
|
|
143 |
Rutledge William |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Sep 10 |
1862 |
38
|
|
|
|
|
143 |
Rutledge Mary |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Apr 10 |
1864 |
36
|
|
|
|
|
143 |
Rutledge Wilfrid |
M |
|
Son |
S |
May 7 |
1891 |
9
|
|
|
|
|
143 |
Rutledge William |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Dec 7 |
1892 |
8
|
|
|
|
|
143 |
Rutledge Leo |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Jun 1 |
1897 |
3
|
|
|
|
|
143 |
Rutledge Harold |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Dec 18 |
1899 |
1
|
|
|
|
|
144 |
Dunlop James |
M |
|
Head |
M |
|
1844 |
56
|
|
|
|
|
144 |
Dunlop Ann |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Jul 12 |
1848 |
52
|
|
|
01 |
|
144 |
Dunlop James Jr. |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Nov 24 |
1876 |
24
|
|
|
|
|
144 |
Dunlop Emily |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Dec 15 |
1878 |
22
|
|
|
01 |
|
144 |
Dunlop Esther |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Dec 12 |
1879 |
21
|
|
|
01 |
|
145 |
Miller Jeremiah |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Apr 25 |
1866 |
34
|
|
|
|
|
145 |
Miller Elizabeth |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Feb 27 |
1858 |
43
|
|
|
|
|
145 |
Miller Claude |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Jan 25 |
1890 |
11
|
|
|
|
|
145 |
Gill William |
M |
|
Step-son |
S |
Nov 15 |
188 |
19
|
|
|
|
|
146 |
Carey Patrick |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Dec 15 |
1855 |
45
|
|
|
01 |
|
146 |
Carey Julia |
F |
|
Daughter |
M |
Jul 2 |
1857 |
43
|
|
|
01 |
|
146 |
Carey Mary |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Jul 2 |
1887 |
13
|
|
|
01 |
|
146 |
Carey Marguerite |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Nov 27 |
1888 |
12
|
|
|
01 |
|
146 |
Carey John |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Jul 30 |
1890 |
10
|
|
|
01 |
|
146 |
Carey Frank |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Jun 4 |
1892 |
8
|
|
|
01 |
|
146 |
Carey Annie |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Feb 10 |
1894 |
7
|
|
|
01 |
|
146 |
Carey Arthur |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Feb 18 |
1896 |
5
|
|
|
01 |
|
146 |
Carey Basil |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Jul 11 |
1898 |
2
|
|
|
01 |
|
146 |
Carey Theresa |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Aug 12 |
1900 |
8/12
|
|
|
|
|
147 |
McFaul John |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Mar 16 |
1859 |
42
|
|
|
|
|
147 |
McFaul Letitia |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Oct 27 |
1858 |
42
|
|
|
|
Line Notes On This Page
The following note applies to line 14:
'Enumerator meant "M" for marital status' |
The following note applies to line 15:
'Enumerator meant "M" for marital status' |
Field Correction Notes on this page
Field correction notes are suggested changes offered by a
proofreader or user, they should not be considered authoritative. If
the transcriber agrees with the suggestion they will change the line.
Notes for changes that have been made are removed periodically. The
presence of an uncorrected note is an extra prompt to the user to
consult the image. It is always good practice to confirm the accuracy
of the transcription by consulting the image.
Field Value Correction Note |
10 |
|
139 |
Carruth | Robert |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Jul 15 |
1834 |
66 |
On line 10,
the value for the givens
field is "Robert",
the suggested correction is "Rob't.". Submitted by Judy van der Veen.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
14 |
|
139 |
Hodgins | Jessie |
F |
|
Daughter |
M |
Apr 19 |
1880 |
20 |
On line 14,
the value for the maritalStatus
field is "M",
the suggested correction is "S". Submitted by Judy van der Veen.
The following comment was attached: Must transcribe as written. Your note indicates that it should be "M".
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
15 |
|
139 |
Hodgins | Frank |
M |
|
Son-in-law |
M |
Mar 9 |
1876 |
25 |
On line 15,
the value for the maritalStatus
field is "M",
the suggested correction is "S". Submitted by Judy van der Veen.
The following comment was attached: Must transcribe as written. Your note indicates that it should be "M".
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
16 |
|
140 |
Clink | Joseph |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Jun 20 |
1861 |
39 |
On line 16,
the value for the day
field is "20",
the suggested correction is "21". Submitted by Judy van der Veen.
The following comment was attached: Over-written - as verified by "st".
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
24 |
|
143 |
Rutledge | William |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Sep 10 |
1862 |
38 |
On line 24,
the value for the givens
field is "William",
the suggested correction is "Wm.". Submitted by Judy van der Veen.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
30 |
|
144 |
Dunlop | James |
M |
|
Head |
M |
|
1844 |
56 |
On line 30,
the value for the givens
field is "James",
the suggested correction is "Ja's.". Submitted by Judy van der Veen.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
45 |
|
146 |
Carey | Annie |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Feb 10 |
1894 |
7 |
On line 45,
the value for the day
field is "10",
the suggested correction is "1". Submitted by Judy van der Veen.
The following comment was attached: Coorected by enumerator to "1st".
|
|
To register as a person researching someone on this page
click here.
Go to: Subdistrict Number: c-29
District: TORONTO (West/Ouest) (City/Cité)
National: Canada.
Quick search for possible matches to 1911 Census
All data on this site is copyrighted, use for personal research is free.
Redistribution requires permission: email census@automatedgenealogy.com