Line #	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	Links
1		128	Hutton Harold		M	Lodger	S	Feb	1895	16
2		129	Anderson Peter	33 - 9 - 24 - W1	M	Head	M	Mar	1861	50
3		129	Anderson Mary		F	Wife	M	Nov	1863	47
4		129	Anderson Donald		M	Son	S	Aug	1886	24
5		129	Anderson William		M	Son	S	Jan	1891	20
6		129	Anderson Mary		F	Daughter	S	Feb	1896	15
7		129	Anderson John		M	Son	S	Jun	1898	12	1**
8		129	Anderson Peter Jr.		M	Son	S	Apr	1903	8
9		130	McLeish George	15 - 9 - 24 - W1	M	Head	M	Jul	1880	30
10		130	McLeish Clara		F	Wife	M	Dec	1880	30
11		130	McLeish John		M	Son	S	Jun	1909	1
12		130	McLeish George		M	Son	S	Oct	1910	7/12
13		130	Anderson Peter		M	Labourer	S	Nov	1889	23
14		131	McLeish Philip	14 - 9 - 24 - W1	M	Head	S	?	1876	34	1*
15		131	Richardson Frank		M	Labourer	S	May	?	34
16		132	Gellespie Andrew	31 - 9 - 24 - W1	M	Head	M	Mar	?	41	1*
17		132	Gellespie Annie		F	Wife	M	Feb	1880	31	1*
18		132	Gellespie Margrete		F	Daughter	S	Dec	1905	5	B1*
19		132	Gellespie William		M	Son	S	Jun	1906	4
20		132	Gellespie Gavin		M	Son	S	Mar	1910	1
21		132	Chadwell Leslie		M	Labourer	S	May	1893	18
22		132	Parson(?) Henry		M	Labourer	S	Dec	1884	26
23		132	Brakey Helen		F	Domestic	S	Jul	1892	18
24		132	Scott Agnes		F	Lodger	S	Jun	1891	19
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50

Line notes on this page:
Line 14: Daniel McLeish homesteaded all of 14 - 9 - 24 - W1 (note added by: James C. CLARK)
Line 16: 1906 links and childrens` birth reg`s show spelling as Gillespie though it could have been enetered as Gellespie here. (note added by: Lois East) (note added by: James C. CLARK)

Surname Notes: Surname notes are used to indicate that while the transcription is correct the enumerator may have recorded the surname incorrectly in the original. The surname note gives a suggested "correct" surname, along with sources and notes to support the suggested "correction".

In household 132 the enumerator recorded the surname as "Gellespie", a suggested alternative is "Gillespie".
The following source(s) support this alternative: "1906 links and childrens` birth reg`s show spelling as Gillespie though it could have been enetered as Gellespie here. (note added by: Lois East)".

In household 132 the enumerator recorded the surname as "Gellespie", a suggested alternative is "Gillespie".
The following source(s) support this alternative: "1906 links and childrens` birth reg`s show spelling as Gillespie though it could have been enetered as Gellespie here. (note added by: Lois East)".