1911 Census of Canada |
Line # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Links |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
63 | Ryan Austin | M | Head | S | Aug | 1878 | 32 | 1* | |||
63 | Ryan Wilfred | M | Brother | S | Jul | 1872 | 38 | ||||
64 | Brown John W | M | Head | M | Apr | 1862 | 49 | 01* | |||
64 | Brown Kristina | F | Wife | M | Aug | 1866 | 45 | 01* | |||
64 | Brown John | M | Son | S | Jul | 1893 | 17 | 01* | |||
64 | Brown Robert J. | M | Son | S | Nov | 1908 | 2 | ||||
64 | Brown Agnes Tait | F | Daughter | S | Jun | 1891 | 20 | 01* | |||
64 | Brown Elizabeth | F | Daughter | S | Mar | 1895 | 16 | 01* | |||
64 | Brown Kristina S | F | Daughter | S | Jul | 1896 | 14 | 01* | |||
64 | Brown Jane Augusta | F | Daughter | S | May | 1898 | 13 | 01* | |||
64 | Brown Mary W | F | Daughter | S | Jun | 1900 | 10 | 01* | |||
64 | Brown Caroline M. | F | Daughter | S | Aug | 1902 | 8 | 1* | |||
64 | Brown Florence | F | Daughter | S | Jul | 1904 | 6 | 1* | |||
65 | Brown David A | M | Head | M | Sep | 1868 | 42 | 01* | |||
65 | Brown Kristina | F | Wife | M | Apr | 1879 | 32 | 01* | |||
65 | Brown David | M | Son | S | Apr | 1902 | 9 | 1* | |||
65 | Brown John | M | Son | S | Jul | 1903 | 7 | 1* | |||
65 | Brown William | M | Son | S | Nov | 1906 | 4 | ||||
65 | Brown Donald | M | Son | S | Mar | 1909 | 2 | ||||
65 | Brown Mary | F | Daughter | S | Nov | 1897 | 13 | 01* | |||
65 | Brown Katy | F | Daughter | S | Dec | ? | ? | 01* | |||
65 | Brown Margaret | F | Daughter | S | May | 1911 | 1/12 | ||||
65 | Calder Thomas? | M | Domestic | S | Dec | 1890 | 21 | 1** | |||
66 | Brown Thomas | M | Head | M | Dec | 1855 | 66 | 1* | |||
66 | Brown Jane | F | Wife | M | Apr | 1871 | 40 | 1* | |||
66 | Brown Sasha Agnus | F | Daughter | S | Mar | 1894 | 17 | 1* | |||
66 | Padfield Jane | F | Lodger | S | Dec | 1887 | 20 | ||||
67 | Bruce Peter | M | Head | W | Aug | 1845 | 65 | 01 | |||
67 | Bruce John | M | Son | S | Aug | 1872 | 28 | 01 | |||
67 | Bruce Jeannett | F | Daughter | S | Nov | 1870 | 31 | 01 | |||
67 | Bruce Donald | M | Brother | S | Oct | 1850 | 60 | 01 | |||
68 | Morrison William | M | Head | M | Dec | 1857 | 53 | 1* | |||
68 | Morrison Mary | F | Wife | M | Sep | 1858 | 52 | 1* | |||
68 | Bl**** Albert | M | Domestic | S | Aug | 1885 | 27 | ||||
69 | Henderson Hugh | M | Head | M | Apr | 1863 | 48 | 01* | |||
69 | Henderson Elizabeth | F | Wife | M | Aug | 1877 | 35 | 01* | |||
69 | Henderson Alie | M | Son | S | Aug | 1898 | 12 | 01* | |||
69 | Henderson James | M | Son | S | May | 1905 | 6 | 1* | |||
69 | Henderson Elizabeth | F | Daughter | S | Dec | 1876 | 14 | 01* | |||
69 | Henderson Katherine | F | Daughter | S | Jun | 1892 | 8 | 1* | |||
69 | Henderson Margaret | F | Daughter | S | Aug | 1898 | 2 | ||||
70 | Rogbill George | M | Head | M | Mar | 1871 | 40 | 01* | |||
70 | Rogbill George | M | Son | S | Feb | 1910 | 1 | ||||
70 | Rogbill Christina | F | Daughter | S | Jun | 1906 | 4 | B1 | |||
70 | Rogbill Elizabeth | F | Daughter | S | Dec | 1907 | 3 | B1 | |||
70 | Rogbill Elizabeth | F | Wife | M | Nov | 1885 | 25 | ||||
70 | ? William | M | Domestic | S | May | 1890 | 21 | ||||
71 | ? David | M | Head | M | Aug | 1837 | 63 | 01* | |||
71 | ? Madline | F | Wife | M | Jun | 1883 | 27 | ||||
71 | ? Donald | M | Son | S | Dec | 1910 | 6/12 |
Line notes on this page:
Line 23: Transcribed surname and given name in reversed order. Hard to say which is right. (note added by: manderson123ster@gmail.com)
Line 27: Suname and given name are reversed on the image. (note added by: manderson123ster@gmail.com)
Line 48: David Coghill had a homestead on NW 32 18 32 W1. Source: Saskatchewan Homestead Index (SHIP) online. (note added by: manderson123ster@gmail.com)
Suggested corrections on this page:
Line # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Links | Actions | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2 | 63 | Ryan | Wilford | M | Partner/Brother | S | Jul | 1872 | 38 | (corrected values) | |||
2 | 63 | Ryan | Wilfred | M | Brother | S | Jul | 1872 | 38 | (current values) | |||
23 | 65 | Calder | Thomas | M | Domestic | S | Dec | 1890 | 21 | Links | (corrected values) | ||
23 | 65 | Calder | Thomas? | M | Domestic | S | Dec | 1890 | 21 | (current values) | |||
Think Thomas is quite clear. This was transcribed opposite to entry in image. I put in line note and alternate surname in case original was right. Maybe Calder could be a given name. (note added by: manderson123ster@gmail.com) | |||||||||||||
26 | 66 | Brown | Sasha Agnes | F | Daughter | S | Mar | 1894 | 17 | Links | (corrected values) | ||
26 | 66 | Brown | Sasha Agnus | F | Daughter | S | Mar | 1894 | 17 | (current values) | |||
Think the r in Sarha is like a printed r. They make them that way a lot in these records (note added by: manderson123ster@gmail.com) | |||||||||||||
26 | 66 | Brown | Sarha Agnes | F | Daughter | S | Mar | 1894 | 17 | Links | (corrected values) | ||
26 | 66 | Brown | Sasha Agnus | F | Daughter | S | Mar | 1894 | 17 | (current values) | |||
Have seen this ennumerator write Sarha before for Sarah. Guess he had trouble with that name! (note added by: manderson123ster@gmail.com) | |||||||||||||
30 | 67 | Bruce | Jeannett(?) | F | Daughter | S | Nov | 1870 | 31 | Links | (corrected values) | ||
30 | 67 | Bruce | Jeannett | F | Daughter | S | Nov | 1870 | 31 | (current values) | |||
34 | 68 | Bluham | Albert | M | Domestic | S | Aug | 1885 | 27 | (corrected values) | |||
34 | 68 | Bl**** | Albert | M | Domestic | S | Aug | 1885 | 27 | (current values) | |||
Think last letters are impossible to read, but first 3 are pretty clear. Correct way to enter is with ??? for number of letters that can`t be read. People get idea of length of word that way. (note added by: manderson123ster@gmail.com) | |||||||||||||
34 | 68 | Blu??? | Albert | M | Domestic | S | Aug | 1885 | 27 | (corrected values) | |||
34 | 68 | Bl**** | Albert | M | Domestic | S | Aug | 1885 | 27 | (current values) | |||
39 | 69 | Henderson | Elizabeth | F | Daughter | S | Dec | 1896 | 14 | Links | (corrected values) | ||
39 | 69 | Henderson | Elizabeth | F | Daughter | S | Dec | 1876 | 14 | (current values) | |||
Looks much like the 9 in 1892 in line below & makes more sense if it is 9 (note added by: manderson123ster@gmail.com) | |||||||||||||
42 | 70 | Coghill | George | M | Head | M | Mar | 1871 | 40 | Links | (corrected values) | ||
42 | 70 | Rogbill | George | M | Head | M | Mar | 1871 | 40 | (current values) | |||
See links to Sk. birth certs for Elizabeth & Christina (note added by: manderson123ster@gmail.com) | |||||||||||||
47 | 70 | Doyle | William | M | Domestic | S | May | 1890 | 21 | (corrected values) | |||
47 | 70 | ? | William | M | Domestic | S | May | 1890 | 21 | (current values) | |||
I (the proofreader) don't really agree with Doyle - really can't see that. I think the ? is better. Pretty illegible to me! (note added by: manderson123ster@gmail.com) | |||||||||||||
48 | 71 | Rogbill | David | M | Head | M | Aug | 1837 | 63 | Links | (corrected values) | ||
48 | 71 | ? | David | M | Head | M | Aug | 1837 | 63 | (current values) | |||
48 | 71 | Coghill (?) | David | M | Head | M | Aug | 1887 | ? | Links | (corrected values) | ||
48 | 71 | ? | David | M | Head | M | Aug | 1837 | 63 | (current values) | |||
49 | 71 | ? | Mary? | F | Wife | M | Jun | 1883 | 27 | (corrected values) | |||
49 | 71 | ? | Madline | F | Wife | M | Jun | 1883 | 27 | (current values) |
Surname Notes: Surname notes are used to indicate that while the transcription is correct the enumerator may have recorded the surname incorrectly in the original. The surname note gives a suggested "correct" surname, along with sources and notes to support the suggested "correction".
On line 23
the enumerator recorded the surname as "Calder", a suggested alternative is "Thomas".
The following source(s) support this alternative: "Calder may well be the last name, but so could Thomas so this covers both possibilities.".
In household 67
the enumerator recorded the surname as "Bower", a suggested alternative is "Bruce".
The following source(s) support this alternative: "Links to other records and census records support Bruce spelling.".
In household 70
the enumerator recorded the surname as "Rogbill", a suggested alternative is "Coghill".
The following source(s) support this alternative: "Coghill in land records (not this one though) & links to Sk birth records support Coghill for last name".
In household 71
the enumerator recorded the surname as "?", a suggested alternative is "Coghill".
The following source(s) support this alternative: "Saskatchewan Homestead Index (SHIP) online & links to other census records".
The following comment was attached to this surname note: "David Coghill had a homestead on NW 32 18 32 W1.".