Line #	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	Links
1		117	Strader Olive		F	Daughter	S	Nov	1897	14	01
2		117	Strader Wilhalmina		F	Daughter	S	Nov	1902	9
3		117	Monk Milinda		F	Mother-in-law	M	Jun	1844	67	01
4		1170	Algate Thomas		M	Head	M	Jul	1843	68	01
5		1170	Algate Grace		F	Wife	M	May	1847	64	01
6		1170	Algate Mary Grace		F	Daughter	S	Feb	1870	41	01
7		118	Merkley Edgar		M	Head	M	Jun	1868	43	01
8		118	Merkley Unice		F	Wife	M	Jan	1871	40	01
9		118	Merkley Levi		M	Son	S	May	1898	13	01
10		118	Merkley Ernest		M	Son	S	Jun	1901	10	01
11		118	Merkley Mark		M	Son	S	Oct	1903	8
12		118	Merkley Olive		F	Daughter	S	May	1907	4
13		118	Hummett Catherin		F	Sister-in-law	S	Feb	1869	42	01
14		119	Summes Alexander		M	Head	W	Jun	1881	29	01
15		120	Hitchman Lois		M	Head	M	Oct	1871	40	01
16		120	Hitchman Hattie		F	Wife	M	Apr	1872	38	01
17		120	Hitchman May		F	Daughter	S	Jun	1894	17	01
18		120	Hitchman Charles		M	Son	S	Aug	1896	15	01
19		120	Hitchman Jay		M	Son	S	Mar	1900	11	01
20		120	Hitchman Lucy		F	Daughter	S	Sep	1904	6
21		120	Hitchman B?tha		F	Daughter	S	Jan	1908	?
22		121	Summes Andrew D		M	Head	M	Jun	1850	61	01
23		121	Summes H?lina		F	Wife	M	Oct	1850	61	01
24		121	Summes Edgar D		M	Son	M	Oct	1883	27	01
25		121	Summes Stella Maud		F	Daughter-in-law	M	Apr	1887	24
26		121	Flord(?) Lamagran		F	Granddaughter	S	Aug	1905	6
27		121	Summes Arther D		M	Grandson	S	Mar	1911	2/12
28		122	Baker John B		M	Head	M	Sep	1858	52	01
29		122	Baker Rosa		F	Wife	M	Aug	1875	36
30		122	Baker Bernice		F	Daughter	S	May	1895	16	01
31		122	Baker Greta		F	Daughter	S	May	1897	14	01
32		122	Baker Stuart		M	Son	S	Sep	1900	10
33		122	Baker R?nic		M	Son	S	Feb	1901	9
34		122	Baker Norman		M	Son	S	Mar	1908	3
35		123	Jackson Hugh		M	Head	M	Apr	1835	76	01
36		123	Jackson Elizabeth		F	Wife	M	Mar	1837	74	01
37		124	Jackson Anderson		M	Head	M	Nov	1874	36	01
38		124	Jackson ?		F	Wife	M	Feb	1875	36	01
39		124	Jackson Gladania(?)		F	Daughter	S	Jun	1906	5
40		124	Jackson Ella		F	Daughter	S	Dec	1908	2
41		125	Rae Walter		M	Head	M	May	1857	54	01
42		125	Rae Eu?dia		F	Wife	M	Aug	1862	48	01
43		125	Rae Lottie		F	Daughter	S	Sep	1888	22	01
44		125	Rae David		M	Son	S	Dec	1892	18	01
45		125	Rae Gertrude		F	Daughter	S	Feb	1895	16	01
46		125	Rae Donald		M	Son	S	May	1897	14	01
47		125	Rae Martha		F	Daughter	S	Jun	1900	10	01
48		125	Rae Douglas		M	Son	S	Jun	1902	8
49		125	Rae Preston		M	Son	S	Jun	1906	5
50		126	Rae George		M	Head	D	Jul	1876	35	01

Line notes on this page:
Line 29: This appears to be a new wife. She doesn`t match the one in the 1901 census. (note added by: James A. Donaldson)

Suggested corrections on this page:

Line #	1	2	3		4	5	6	7	8	9	10	Links	Actions
15		120	Hitchman	Luis		M	Head	M	Oct	1871	40	Links	(corrected values)
15		120	Hitchman	Lois		M	Head	M	Oct	1871	40		(current values)
See family link to 1901 census. (note added by: James A. Donaldson)
21		120	Hitchman	Bertha		F	Daughter	S	Jan	1908	3		(corrected values)
21		120	Hitchman	B?tha		F	Daughter	S	Jan	1908	?		(current values)
The "e" appears to be run into the base of the"B" in Bertha and the age when enlarged 300% looks like a "3" to me. (note added by: James A. Donaldson)
23		121	Summes	Helina		F	Wife	M	Oct	1850	61	Links	(corrected values)
23		121	Summes	H?lina		F	Wife	M	Oct	1850	61		(current values)
See link to 1901 census. (note added by: James A. Donaldson)
26		121	Flood(?)	Laura Jean		F	Granddaughter	S	Aug	1905	6		(corrected values)
26		121	Flord(?)	Lamagran		F	Granddaughter	S	Aug	1905	6		(current values)
In the "Family Name" field the second "o" in Flood is squeezed. The first name "Laura" seems clear. The middle name seems to start with a "J" although the tail below the line is faint.. (note added by: James A. Donaldson)
33		122	Baker	Bennie		M	Son	S	Dec	1904	6		(corrected values)
33		122	Baker	R?nic		M	Son	S	Feb	1901	9		(current values)
The "B" in Bennie is not closed at the bottom but has the same sweep infront as in Bernice on line 30. The "Month of Birth" field looks very much like "Dec" as on line 40. The "Year of Birth" field looks like it ends in a "4" when enlarged to 200%. (note added by: James A. Donaldson)
38		124	Jackson	Vanelia		F	Wife	M	Feb	1875	36	Links	(corrected values)
38		124	Jackson	?		F	Wife	M	Feb	1875	36		(current values)
See link to 1901 census. (note added by: James A. Donaldson)
39		124	Jackson	Florance		F	Daughter	S	Jun	1906	5		(corrected values)
39		124	Jackson	Gladania(?)		F	Daughter	S	Jun	1906	5		(current values)
The top of the "F" is missing but when enlarged to 300% this looks like Florance to me. (note added by: James A. Donaldson)
42		125	Rae	Cornelia		F	Wife	M	Aug	1862	48	Links	(corrected values)
42		125	Rae	Eu?dia		F	Wife	M	Aug	1862	48		(current values)
See link to 1901 census. (note added by: James A. Donaldson)
47		125	Rae	Mertle		F	Daughter	S	Jun	1900	10	Links	(corrected values)
47		125	Rae	Martha		F	Daughter	S	Jun	1900	10		(current values)
See link to 1901 census. The cross on the "t" extends and is darker over the"l". (note added by: James A. Donaldson)
50		126	Rae	George		M	Head	D	Jul	1874	35	Links	(corrected values)
50		126	Rae	George		M	Head	D	Jul	1876	35		(current values)
When enlarged 400% this can bee seen as a "4". See link to 1901 census. (note added by: James A. Donaldson)
This is an "S" similar to his nephew on line 49 above. He has taken over the care of his unmarried siblings on pg 13. (note added by: James A. Donaldson)
50		126	Rae	George		M	Head	S	Jul	1876	35	Links	(corrected values)
50		126	Rae	George		M	Head	D	Jul	1876	35		(current values)

Surname Notes: Surname notes are used to indicate that while the transcription is correct the enumerator may have recorded the surname incorrectly in the original. The surname note gives a suggested "correct" surname, along with sources and notes to support the suggested "correction".

In household 118 the enumerator recorded the surname as "Merkley", a suggested alternative is "Markle".
The following source(s) support this alternative: "The 1901 census shows this family as Markle.".
The following comment was attached to this surname note: "See link to 1901 census where this family is recorded as "Markle".".

In household 121 the enumerator recorded the surname as "Summes", a suggested alternative is "Summers".
The following source(s) support this alternative: "The 1901 census shows this family as Summers which is most likely correct".